I finally got a week off from work as our school where I teach had its Easter break (Spring break to other schools). While it was far too short and another week would not have hurt, it was a nice time for relaxation and catching up on some things too, which I did. A few things happened during that week though which are worth mentioning.
On Monday the 21st, Pope Francis passed away. As a Catholic myself, this is a very significant thing as it means that soon a new Pontiff will be sitting on the Chair of St. Peter in Rome. I have managed to live through about 5 Popes so far (Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and now Francis). The bulk of my life - beginning in my childhood and going into my mid-30s - was the Pontificate of Saint John Paul II. JPII was a good Pope overall - not perfect, but he had many great qualities. Benedict was also a good Pope, as he championed orthodoxy and a return to our roots as a Church. Francis though was a whole different breed altogether. He was both the first Jesuit Pope as well as the first from the New World (an Italo-Argentinian by birth). But, he was also a Pope who had a reign that tended to be extremely controversial. On one hand, he was sort of a strong advocate for the marginalized, which I suppose was a good virtue. On the other, he also had some issues - he was not exactly theologically orthodox, and at times his ill-tempered way of handling people coupled with his somewhat arbitrary dismissal of certain aspects of Church Tradition were concerning. The introduction of the disastrous document Traditionale Custodis is a case in point. Francis hated conservatives and traditionalists, and found ways to be punitive against those who disagreed with him in what appeared to be retaliatory. What he did in particular to Cardinal Burke, Bishop Strickland, and Fr. Frank Pavone, among others, was shocking, while at the same time he touted individuals such as the "Rainbow Jesuit" James Martin. Add to that the Pachamama mess and this whole "Synodality" thing, and it caused much friction in the Church. So, how does a more faithful Catholic who values Tradition view Francis? Let me give a brief proposal of my own.
In the long run, Francis was a validly-elected Pope, so to that end he was to be respected in his official capacity. And, on occasion he did some good stuff, such as upholding the sanctity of life and traditional marriage. However, on the other hand, Francis was radical, by theological standards he was a liberal, and his personality was not always the most genial either (he was called in some ecclesiastical circles in Argentina "Old Vinegar Face"). That being said, it is possible to do two things at once. First, we pray that he had a conversion of heart before his repose, and we also remember his soul as we do all departed. Second, we can also still in good conscience take issue with some of Francis's more radical ideas, and we can pray that his successor will be someone much more nuanced and conciliatory to the conservatives like myself he tried (whether intentionally or not) to alienate and oppose. The possibility of a more orthodox Pope, even moderately so like Benedict XVI was, is good - some of the candidates for consideration include Cardinal Zen of China and Cardinal Sarah of Africa, both of whom are very orthodox. As we start looking toward who the successor to Francis will be, I just pray our leaders understand the needs of the Church and don't push political nonsense.
It is also worth mentioning that there have been much worse Popes than Francis - by the standards of some in history, Francis was mild actually. The Bride of Christ is still present on this earth, so its leadership is human and prone to imperfection. Therefore, bad and corrupt clergy are a given. What we cannot do is let the bad eggs and rotten fruit taint the entire Church, and therefore we use discretion when trying to separate the actions and legacies of fallible leadership from the eternal vocation of the Bride of Christ herself. This is why I will refrain personally from attacking Francis directly, although I do have many fundamental disagreements with his tenure as Pope. Even the best and holiest of Popes have moments of displaying their own concupiscent nature - the Pope, after all, is not God and thus is subject to many of the same temptations, limitations, and other challenges we all deal with as human beings. It is a Pope's attitude and ultimately the reality inside his heart that makes the difference, and only God can truly know the heart. So, in summary, we can pray for the soul of Francis while still disagreeing with many of the things he has done, and there is no conflict with our faith in doing so.
Aside from the passing of Pope Francis, we experienced Easter 2025 this past Sunday. Another year surviving the fasts and abstinences of Lent, and now it is an adjustment getting back into a more festal mindset - no more seafood or cheese pizzas on Fridays, the return of the "Gloria" at Mass, and other things including the shift in the daily decade of the Rosary I pray from the Sorrowful Mysteries to the Glorious Mysteries. And, that leads me to a brief discussion of my own devotional practice.
I have neither the time nor the focus to pray a complete Rosary every day, so for the past few years I have structured my devotions this way. To begin, I say a decade of the Rosary, followed by doing the daily Mass reading, and then more personal prayers. By saying a decade of the Rosary, that requires an explanation. Each set of Mysteries of the Rosary consist of five decades - each focusing on one Mystery within the five. The Mysteries are divided thus - The Joyful, the Luminous (introduced 20 years ago by Pope St. John Paul II), the Sorrowful, and the Glorious. Traditionally, certain days of the week were set aside to pray a specific set of Mysteries, and many people who practice praying the Rosary still do this. However, I do it differently. For me, I focus on a set of Mysteries for a week (one each day) and then I organize them according to the Church year. So, this is my pattern to go by:
1. Advent, Christmas to Epiphany - the Joyful Mysteries
2. Epiphany to Quinquegessima Sunday - the Luminous Mystery
3. The seasons of Lent and Holy Week - the Sorrowful Mysteries
4. From Easter through Trinity Sunday - the Glorious Mysteries
5. Ordinary time between Trinity and the First Sunday of Advent - one set of Mysteries each week.
Doing it this way for me is like more or less living the life that Christ lived as the Mysteries are then coordinated to the chronological order of Christ's life. I would even consider it a way of "walking in the footsteps of Jesus" because it then takes on a greater significance. The Rosary is not a mandated devotion, and therefore it can be adjusted and practiced in a way that reflects the devotee's convictions without compromising Magisterial truth. It is a different type of devotion, and as far as I know, I may be the only person who does it like this. However, the spiritual benefits of doing it for me are fruitful, and thus I feel right doing it my way in this case.
The problem with the Rosary - even an adjusted one like the one I pray - is that it can try patience. You have to keep track of the number of "Ave Marias" said and then make sure you are on the right Mystery. And, when you are pressed for time in the morning in particular, it can be a hurried exercise. Some of the prayers, in all honesty, get a bit tedious - the "Glory Be" comes to mind here. But, they are there for a reason so we overcome our own limitations by being faithful in our devotion. I no doubt will have some staunch person who will gasp in horror that I said that and say in Greta Thunberg fashion "How dare you!!" But, let's be honest - a consistent prayer life is not always comfortable or convenient, and even the most tedious of prayers hold spiritual benefit for us. So, despite hurrying through those tedious acts sometimes, God sees thankfully our hearts, and he sees our faithfulness. And for those who would take issue, please be honest with yourselves too - are you always ecstatic to say prayers?? I would wager a month's salary to say negative on that, because to say otherwise means you are lying. We don't have to feign religious zeal to be faithful, and thank God we have a merciful God who understands that. Even Jesus Himself grew weary at times of praying in all honesty, so we are in good company.
This was a slightly different approach from my usual observations today, but I nonetheless hope they will give the reader some edification. Thanks for allowing me to share, and will see you next time!