As I sit here monitoring a group of students taking what is called MAP testing for two hours, I am reading a book entitled A Practical Guide to Culture, authored by John Stonestreet and Brett Kunkle. These authors are Evangelical Protestants, but much of what they say does dovetail traditional Catholic values regarding culture and how we relate to it. I will get into more of that momentarily as there is still a lot to digest from it.
This morning, speaking of culture, you will recall I live in a huge city called Baltimore. Baltimore is big, although it has been bleeding population for many years now. It is also considered to be one of the most hazardous cities in the nation due to a high homicide rate, as well as decades of corrupt leadership in its city government which haven't done the people that live here any favors. It is also, with possibly Detroit and Atlanta, one of the few cities in the US that has a majority Black population. Even at the school where I teach, a good 52% or more of students are Black, and the remainder are Hispanics and other ethnicities. What I am about to say about this is no reflection on every member of a certain ethnic group as well, given there are good apples and bad apples in every proverbial barrel. However, the demographic does reveal something about why a city like Baltimore is like it is, and facts don't lie when you look at evidence. Let's get into that.
If you drive in certain neighborhoods of Baltimore, some things really stand out. For one, many of the iconic rowhouses are now largely abandoned, and they are decaying by the second. Another thing worth noticing is how garbage is just randomly and carelessly laying around on almost every street, and the level of filth is alarming. Added to that is the prominence of ugly, glaring, and bold graffiti - no blank surface is untouched by that for long. Much of the graffiti looks like a foreign language too - it is largely gang-related code, which makes it even more concerning as that means there are criminal gangs operating in the city. There is additionally an epidemic of porch piracy - our housemate noted that many things that get stolen off porches and sold at a pawn shop a block or two away from our house, and it is usually to score a few bucks to feed some destructive habit - crack and fentanyl are both epidemic in this city. The "hood culture" of this city is frankly something ugly, foreign, and even hazardous, and to be honest, I don't feel entirely comfortable living here. While a large percentage of the activities described could be attributed to Blacks in the city, it is not all Black crime - there are plenty of White culprits as well. However, the White population enables this bad behavior because of one important factor - many Whites in the city are upper middle-class, and are politically left-leaning, and they think this type of adverse behavior is "cultural expression" and seem to enjoy deterioration of society because they are actually insulated from the worst aspects of it. However, the local Black and Hispanic populations - I am talking about the "silent majority" who just work, support their families, and try to live productive lives - know the issues and they are not happy about this either. They understand that there are some elements among their population that project negative stereotypes of them on others, and I have talked with them personally. These are not bad people by any means - they want to just live life in peace like any decent person does. However, the urban blight in their communities is being enabled by Leftist politicians and their rich White liberal allies while good people suffer as a result - in order for the city to change, that attitude must change. This now leads to a discussion (or rather a tongue lashing) I had with the campus minister at this school just yesterday.
Our campus minister is an obese man who does not take pride in his personal appearance - his pants are always sagging below the equator, and he looks like that creepy dude you associate with some old lady's basement. He tells his story of being a volunteer with a Catholic lay apostolate called Maryknoll, but also acknowledges that much of his worldview was shaped by Jesuit thinking. He additionally possesses some degree in "liberation theology," and spent a considerable amount of time in El Salvador and other Central American regions before coming here. The problem is his narrative however - he loves throwing the word "justice" around like a mantra, but the concept for him is extremely subjective and not consistent. For instance, he often spouts a bunch of anti-ICE rhetoric regarding undocumented immigrants, but I was quick to notice that he was largely silent about real atrocities going on in the world, such as the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria, and the fact that Iranians are being slaughtered by their regime on the streets for simply existing. He also does not acknowledge things such as the March for Life, and it goes completely ignored when the topic comes up. Further, when he talks about El Salvador in any capacity, he has sympathy for Marxist guerillas there and says that atrocities were supposedly committed by the Salvadoran government with supposed US backing (this guy, who is an American, hates his country with a passion, in other words). However, what this guy did not count on is that I know many Central American expats myself, and they tell a different story - according to them, guerillas (largely funded with Cuban cash) would kill military personnel, steal the uniforms, and then dress up in them to make it look like the government was destroying churches and such - it was the same ploy Hitler used to invade Poland in September 1939 and it makes sense that leftist totalitarians would use tactics of other totalitarians to gain support. The result was that the guerillas then would garner support and sympathy for their cause, and the Salvadoran government was made out to look like the villains. For a supposedly educated Catholic missionary to not only fall for this drech but also disseminate it is beyond comprehension for me, as it just makes no sense whatsoever. But, a narrative that stokes an emotional response is the ultimate weapon of psychological warfare, and there are allies these people have in the highest positions of power too which ultimately are funding them - I guarantee the campus minister has a very comfortable salary, and although he tries to look like a bum (a case of humble pride) he has quite a racket going. His "justice mantra" is just that - an emotional ploy to manipulate others to follow his inconsistent garbage, and for a school filled with urban minority students, he has a fertile field to spread that false gospel. The problem with this is that he is giving a wrong perception of "justice," as his version of that concept is essentially the same as every tyrant who has ever seized the leadership of a nation - tyrants such as Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Kim Il-Sung, Castro, Hugo Chavez, and others have used the term "justice" to create their corrupt systems. It is a justice that has its basis in mindless rhetoric and not true faith or conviction, and as a result it is a flawed version of the real thing. So, let's revisit this a minute:
Faith without justice - legalism
Justice without faith - tyranny
Again too, the key to true justice is the conversion of the individual soul, and if you can save a soul, you can transform the world. This is why evangelization is restorative - it not only brings salvation to a single person, but it can also impact a society for the better too. The campus minister here grossly misses this, because he doesn't give a damn about souls or spiritual things - he is driven by a selfish political agenda devoid of true faith, and although he cloaks it in "religious" language, in reality it is a tinkling chorus of cymbals just making a lot of discordant noise. Unless individuals start to really come to Christ and allow his spirit to transform him, working through supernatural grace, society will not improve. And, our enemies know this - they know that if they can figuratively castrate Christian faith, they can then gain the upper hand. People like this campus minister are playing into that masterfully, and the politicized, weak, and ineffectual "faith" he claims to espouse is in reality nothing - it is devoid of truth, true conviction, and it will ultimately reveal itself as the fraudulent imitation it is. I am convinced that the campus minister is also a functional atheist, or at least he has more in common with them because the true God is not what he worships - the man worships his ideology like an idol. This is why those who call themselves "Catholic educators" need to experience a true conversion of heart, and if that happens so too will many Catholic schools be transformed. That is the answer. Stonestreet and Kunkle summarize this well on page 58 of their book when they say this - reconciled ones are to be the reconcilers. So true, and the profundity of that simple statement speaks volumes.
On the topic of racism, the authors of the book are very balanced and nuanced, and I intend to agree with them. They essentially say that racism is not something that has disappeared, but it isn't the problem it is often made out to be. The real way to combat racism is to accept what God's word says about creation - it says we all come from the same two parents (Adam and Eve), and even with our differences we are all essentially still "millionth first cousins." It is also worth noting too that what is called "race" is not really race at all - it is ethnicity. A Black person and a White person may have a difference in shades of melanin, but at the fundamental level both are still essentially human beings. This is why interracial dating and marriage is not only possible, but it is normal - if a Black woman and a White man (or vise versa) fall in love and eventually marry, it's OK - it is just normal relationship dynamics between two human beings of different ethnicities. For even some Fundamentalists that have preached against this in the past, they got their views not from Scripture or the historical understanding of the issue, but rather from Herbert Spencer's social Darwinian garbage as well as from bohemian weirdos like Margaret Sanger and Alfred Kinsey, who used evolutionary biology to promote their own agendas. Many Blacks in the US do not understand that the abortion industry had its roots in an abhorrent ideology called eugenics, and at its core there was a racist and even genocidal motivation. Often, that means that the ones who like hollering "racism" about everything may themselves be the most racist of all. It is time the facts were not hidden and brought to light about this type of thing.
The same is true of vices such as transgenderism and homosexuality - these are not the preferences of oppressed minorities, but are the casual choices and unfettered moral ambiguity of sinners who want to turn their bad behavior into a civil right. The Bible is very clear on this from the beginning to the end - God's design for marriage was one man and one woman only, and any other arrangement (homosexual unions, bisexuality, multiple partners, polygamy, etc.) was viewed as unnatural and essentially against what God's natural law established. Even those who believe in Darwinian evolution would have to concede that the idea of natural selection is based on procreation, and two dudes or two women cannot fulfill that. However, the Darwinians have tried to work around that contradiction in their logic by embracing such nonsense as Magnus Hirschfeld's "Third Sex Theory," which states that homosexuals are biologically programmed the way they are to evolve into a "third sex," which also makes no earthly sense whatsoever because it fails to note that procreation guarantees the survival of a species, and unless homosexuals become hermaphrodites or something, that ain't gonna happen! And the likelihood of hermaphrodism is so rare, and no one "transforms" into it, that this theory too will be discredited. Ah, but don't underestimate the ideologues - we can accelerate the process with transgenderism! Sure, let's see how that works too because once someone's inner plumbing is removed, they cannot reproduce. And, true science cannot accommodate such a thing because again, true science is a result of natural law, which itself has a supernatural origin (God). What that means is that scientism, which is an ideology and not true science, will always fail despite its intentions - as a matter of fact, not only will it fail, but it will inevitably make a situation worse. The bottom line is that natural law, divine revelation, and good old fashioned common sense easily dispel all this ideological nonsense, and we need to pay more attention to facts and less to our subjective feelings and opinions.
I have rambled enough today, but to summarize, to transform culture, the inner conversion of individuals is necessary and integral. Unless we do that, no transformation is possible. Until Christ returns, we will never have a perfect culture, but we can do our best to have a better culture. Thanks for allowing me to share today, and will see you next time.