It is hard to believe that recently I have commemorated 35 years (October 1st) of collecting vintage big band records, and due to many factors I was delayed in giving the "state of the collection" address here this year, so I wanted to go ahead and do that now.
To start, let's get the boring statistics out of the way. As of October 1st, my music collection now stands at 918 LP records, 1236 CD recordings, 100 DVD's of vintage "soundies," concerts, and big band-related movies, and around 300 or so 78 RPM records. That means that since last year I have gained 6 new LP records, 29 new CD's, and only 3 new DVD's. Growth was not spectacular, but good given the fact that in January we moved back to my home turf after 27 years in Florida. The anticipated outlook is about the same for next year, as my collection is at a point where there will not be much spectacular growth although I am looking to get some good stuff regardless. Outside of the numbers though, a lot was significant about this past year, and I wanted to give some highlights.
To begin, I was fortunate enough to come across a vendor who has managed to reissue many rare LP's that I wanted to get on CD that honestly I thought would never be released. A couple in Arizona, Gary and Joan Sprunk, operate a service called My Music Boutique (or Arizol Music - their website in case you're interested is www.mymusicboutique.com), and they have reissued a number of rare LP's that many people have forgotten about. Big band recordings are often associated with the vintage 78's of their heyday, and while those are classic and definitely essential to a collection, what is often overlooked is the LP era of the 1950's and 1960's, during which many good original big band records were released, especially by the more "sweet" bands. The advantage to those is that many of them were either originally or later reissued albums which were stereo quality, meaning the sound is excellent on them. Some of the bands who were very prolific at recording excellent dance band LP's in that timeframe were Sammy Kaye, Guy Lombardo, Lester Lanin, Ernie Heckscher, Lawrence Welk (naturally!), Peter Duchin, Jan Garber, and the Elgart Brothers. A lot of good swing-oriented bands, such as Woody Herman and Les Brown, released some excellent material too. Collectors often overlook the value of these good records, and often they can be found by the dozens at thrift shops and junk stores in most towns. I would encourage you to start thinking about maybe getting a collection of those if you can do so, because in the very near future those will be antiques as well. And, that being said, I commend the Sprunks for taking on the great task of releasing many of those quality LP's as CD recordings, and I was fortunate to have purchased about a dozen of them over the past several months from them. Therefore, when you can, check out their website, as they are always coming up with new gems.
The second thing I wanted to reflect on is that with our move back to my home territory, something significant happened this year in regard to my music collection. Being we now live in Hagerstown, MD, I am actually quite excited to know that we are only about an hour or so away from the very store in Rio, WV, where I got my first records over 35 years ago, the famous "Rio Mall." Since moving back here, Barbara and I have managed two visits over there, and I bought my first LP there back in February since my last purchase there back in 1987. The LP was a reissue of Shep Fields's material from the 1960's, but it was a nice find nonetheless. And, surprisingly, they are still the exact same price I paid for them years ago - a quarter a record! The old Rio Mall has changed somewhat over the years, as they have added a second story and now also carry groceries, which is something they never had years ago. The records too have changed location - whereas they used to be in boxes in the front of the store back years ago adjacent to the counter, now they are in an adjoining room where the new grocery stock is at, and they have a lot of them. It was good to be able to visit there again after all these years - that place has been in business well over 50 years, and still going strong as the Fitzwater family still operates it. I even got to see Rick, who is the son of the owner, and wonder if he remembered me as the "record boy" who used to load up on those quarter LP's years ago? Rick was actually the guy who sold me most of my original collection, so he and I were used to doing a lucrative business back in the day. It is almost surreal to know that after 35 years I was finally able to visit the place where my massive collection had its origin, and that it is still going strong. No doubt now that we live fairly close I will be visiting them more in the future - Rick does have an antique accordion I want to get my hands on eventually, as he wants $100 for it, so maybe I might just do that soon. If all the factors are favorable, that may just happen too.
The third aspect of my collection this year is upgraded housing. Since we now live in a mobile home instead of a more spacious house like we have been used to, it is a bit cumbersome to haul around 19 boxes of records and 8 boxes of CD's, so I had to come up with a solution. So, a couple of months ago I was able to purchase two large metal cabinets, and they are shaping up to be the perfect housing for my extensive collection. The first cabinet at this point is together, and all the single LP records are in that one, as well as 2/3 of my 78's. The second cabinet is a work in progress, hopefully to be assembled by the week after this is published, and it will house my boxed LP sets, including my "Holy Grail" collection of the Franklin Mint 100-LP Greatest Recordings of the Big Band Era set that came out in the early 1980's. I recall, when I started collecting records, how that set was advertised in the various issues of Reader's Digest in those years, and I would look at that and literally drool because I wanted that collection so bad - if you love big band music, it is the crowning glory of a collector's library. They are housed in boxes of two records each (making 50 double albums) and the records are pressed in red vinyl. As big as it is, it doesn't contain everything, but it is perhaps the most ambitious and largest undertaking of big band reissues to ever hit the market. I finally got my collection in 2006, thanks to the miracle of internet purchasing called EBay, and that collection is now part of my overall collection, comprising almost 10% by itself of my LP's. So far, not even the CD era has produced anything that ambitious, and it would be interesting if someone did try to reissue that collection on CD's - how many CD's would it have? If I were to guess, I would say at about two LP's fitting on one CD, and two CD's per album, it could easily be a 25-case set of CD's if it were reissued. Definitely something to keep an eye out for in the future for sure!
As I reflect back on my collection over the years, I am thinking about many things. For instance, other than a few of us who are diehard collectors who really love vintage big bands, no one knows a lot about them anymore, which makes collection and preservation of this great music more crucial. Also, in the coming year, I am focusing on big bands as far as their roots, how they developed, etc. Do you know, for instance, that there were dance bands in the 1880's who recorded? Of course, there was Will Marion Cook, who only has one recorded work to his name (he is featured on a record by the legendary Ethel Waters in the 1920's as a pianist), but there were also people like Edward Issler and even Johann Strauss III, who for all intents and purposes had the first "society orchestra" that played his uncle's and grandfather's classic waltzes. Many of those recordings are on cylinders, and maybe I will come across some of those in the future as cylinder recordings are not something I have had much luck in finding over the years. Fortunately though, there are sites such as archive.org that have those vintage recordings available for download, and I have been able to capture them on flash drives. I am anticipating that someone - a diehard collector like myself - may see the importance of a CD reissue of that vintage stuff, and when such a person does, I will plan on getting it. Adding people like Edward Issler to my extensive collection, for instance, would be a great accomplishment for me. And, who knows, maybe I might get my hands on some cylinder recordings this year too - we'll see what happens.
To wrap up this end-of-year reflection as far as my collection is concerned, the question remains about where I will be going this year? My immediate goal is to more or less look out for some significant new releases that interest me, as well as tying up some loose ends in my Amazon wish list - I would love to add some newer material by Toshiko Akiyoshi and Lew Tabackin, for instance, and have that "waiting in the wings," so to speak. My other watch item this year is a recent 5-CD collection of all of the legendary accordionist Charles Magnante's vintage recordings, which is the product of accordion virtuoso and historian Dr. Henry Doktorski. Charles Magnante is significant to my collection in that he, like many soloists such as Rudy Wiedoeft and others, also are pivotal figures in the history and legacy of big bands. Therefore, his collection added to my library is a very imminent objective. I don't anticipate a lot of purchases this year, but will be always vigilant and keep my eyes open. Also, a couple of more trips to Rio may yield a few more LP's and 78's as well. Any rate, that is what my year was like as far as music collections are concerned, and I will see you all soon.
I am David Thrower, and this is a collection of snippets of my life. On this page you will find articles about Appalachian heritage, family history, music, and other good stuff. It is a lighthearted page, so hope you will visit often as this is like my virtual homestead, front porch and all.
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
A Major Announcement
2017 has been a year of a lot of changes for us. We moved from Florida, where we have lived for 27 years, back to the North - Hagerstown, MD. Hagerstown is about 2 hours east of where I was born and spent most of my early life, and it is seriously good to be back home again. It hasn't been without its challenges though - we still need a lot of furniture for the house yet, and we are still settling in even at 9 months later. But, it was the best decision we could have made, and no regrets. Our new chapter has also produced new beginnings for us in other areas too, so that is why I wanted to write this today - one of those new areas is a very big change, but it too is good.
If you have followed my story on all my pages, you will recall that in 2000, when I was 30 years old, I was confirmed and received my First Communion as an adult convert to the Catholic Church. For a few years afterward, we faithfully attended both the Cathedral of St. Jude in St. Petersburg, FL (where I was confirmed) as well as at a local Byzantine Catholic parish. In 2006 though, a series of events in our lives compelled us to attend a traditional Anglo-Catholic parish for about 10 years, and I honestly thought that would be our permanent church home - it was conservative, and I could still remain faithfully Catholic in conviction while fully participating in the parish we attended. So, for many years I served in various capacities in that particular jurisdiction, and actually did so until our recent move back to this area. At that point, some things happened.
First, although our initial parish in Frederick, MD, was the same as what we had been used to for about 10 years, something was not quite right about it and in time we finally decided to move on for various reasons. So, we found right down the street from our house a Roman Catholic parish called St. Joseph's, and earlier this summer we began attending as their Mass times were also compatible with Barbara's work schedule. In time, this eventually led to my taking the steps to return to the Roman Catholic Church, and I was welcomed back with open arms and hearts. That was therefore one reason.
A second reason has to do with my university where I am currently wrapping up a Master's degree, Franciscan University of Steubenville. After being somewhat disillusioned with the direction my alma mater, Southeastern University in Florida (where I had gotten my BA in 1996), I transferred out of the graduate program I had started there in 2012 and transferred to Steubenville. Learning so much about the Catholic faith began to make me recommit to my own Catholic convictions, and later it also became a very pivotal factor in choosing to come back home to the Church. And, here we are. There are of course other reasons, as well as more detail as to our reasons stated, but these two major reasons were the decisive factors in our return to the Catholic Church this year.
I bear no ill will or animosity against the faithful Anglicans I had fellowshipped with for all those years - we had gotten to know a number of good people, and they have been a blessing to us in more ways than I can document here. And, it is not against the Anglican tradition itself - the Anglican spiritual and liturgical tradition is a very rich one, and I also learned a lot from that too. However, with certain opportunities opening up as well as other factors, we have made the right decision.
So, it has been several months, and I now am thoroughly Roman Catholic again, and it feels right to be so - I have been able to tap back into a stability and solid faith that is also helping to strengthen me as well. And, I also get to use all that classroom work in a practical way - I have been commissioned as a 6th-grade catechist for our new parish, and am able to disciple an amazing group of about a dozen sharp young people. It is a reward in itself to be able to embark on the high calling of catechetical work that I have been in preparation for, rather than being merely a flunkie somewhere while waiting on the right moment, etc.
I still have a course to plot out, but it is coming together. Being on the verge of finishing my Master's at Steubenville and starting a doctoral program next fall at Catholic University of America, as well as my new membership in the Knights of Columbus and the Confraternity of St. Peter (an organization within the Roman Catholic Church that seeks to preserve the old Mass in Latin, called Tridentine), have integrated me well into our new parish.
I want my former Anglican folks to know I still think a lot of them, and many are still dear friends. Therefore, this in no way reflects upon anything about them - rather, it is just a different direction God has called us to. It took probably about four months of intense soul-searching to come to this place we are now, and I am probably at the most peace I have been personally in a while. It also will serve us as well being that doors can open for opportunities at this point that otherwise wouldn't have, and we have to go where we can achieve a balance of both fulfilling our vocation while retaining life stability. That is the primary reason we are here now.
I also know this will come as a shock to some, and I understand that completely. However, nothing has fundamentally changed much in my convictions - I was always Catholic first as far as my Christian identity is concerned, and that hasn't changed for at least 20 or more years. Now, I can be fully free to live that out, as well as also being more informed about what that faith is now, thanks in part to excellent instructors at Steubenville who have been a phenomenal witness - people such as Dr. Mark Miravalle, Dr. Petroc Willey, Dr. John Bergsma, Dr. James Pauley, Dr. Scott Hahn, Dr. Regis Martin, and of course my ever-reliable admissions rep, Tom Weishaar. Them, as well as those two old Lebanese ladies - Freda Faris and Bertha Nassif - I used to walk to church back all those years ago when I was an awkward 16-year-old who was being prompted to conversion by the Holy Spirit Himself. Any rate, this brief announcement should hopefully answer any questions some may have had lately, and I thank you for understanding. God's blessings be with each of you reading this, and continue to remember myself and my family in your prayers as we begin to step through those doors God is opening for us.
If you have followed my story on all my pages, you will recall that in 2000, when I was 30 years old, I was confirmed and received my First Communion as an adult convert to the Catholic Church. For a few years afterward, we faithfully attended both the Cathedral of St. Jude in St. Petersburg, FL (where I was confirmed) as well as at a local Byzantine Catholic parish. In 2006 though, a series of events in our lives compelled us to attend a traditional Anglo-Catholic parish for about 10 years, and I honestly thought that would be our permanent church home - it was conservative, and I could still remain faithfully Catholic in conviction while fully participating in the parish we attended. So, for many years I served in various capacities in that particular jurisdiction, and actually did so until our recent move back to this area. At that point, some things happened.
First, although our initial parish in Frederick, MD, was the same as what we had been used to for about 10 years, something was not quite right about it and in time we finally decided to move on for various reasons. So, we found right down the street from our house a Roman Catholic parish called St. Joseph's, and earlier this summer we began attending as their Mass times were also compatible with Barbara's work schedule. In time, this eventually led to my taking the steps to return to the Roman Catholic Church, and I was welcomed back with open arms and hearts. That was therefore one reason.
A second reason has to do with my university where I am currently wrapping up a Master's degree, Franciscan University of Steubenville. After being somewhat disillusioned with the direction my alma mater, Southeastern University in Florida (where I had gotten my BA in 1996), I transferred out of the graduate program I had started there in 2012 and transferred to Steubenville. Learning so much about the Catholic faith began to make me recommit to my own Catholic convictions, and later it also became a very pivotal factor in choosing to come back home to the Church. And, here we are. There are of course other reasons, as well as more detail as to our reasons stated, but these two major reasons were the decisive factors in our return to the Catholic Church this year.
I bear no ill will or animosity against the faithful Anglicans I had fellowshipped with for all those years - we had gotten to know a number of good people, and they have been a blessing to us in more ways than I can document here. And, it is not against the Anglican tradition itself - the Anglican spiritual and liturgical tradition is a very rich one, and I also learned a lot from that too. However, with certain opportunities opening up as well as other factors, we have made the right decision.
Our new parish home, St. Joseph Church in Hagerstown, MD
So, it has been several months, and I now am thoroughly Roman Catholic again, and it feels right to be so - I have been able to tap back into a stability and solid faith that is also helping to strengthen me as well. And, I also get to use all that classroom work in a practical way - I have been commissioned as a 6th-grade catechist for our new parish, and am able to disciple an amazing group of about a dozen sharp young people. It is a reward in itself to be able to embark on the high calling of catechetical work that I have been in preparation for, rather than being merely a flunkie somewhere while waiting on the right moment, etc.
I still have a course to plot out, but it is coming together. Being on the verge of finishing my Master's at Steubenville and starting a doctoral program next fall at Catholic University of America, as well as my new membership in the Knights of Columbus and the Confraternity of St. Peter (an organization within the Roman Catholic Church that seeks to preserve the old Mass in Latin, called Tridentine), have integrated me well into our new parish.
I want my former Anglican folks to know I still think a lot of them, and many are still dear friends. Therefore, this in no way reflects upon anything about them - rather, it is just a different direction God has called us to. It took probably about four months of intense soul-searching to come to this place we are now, and I am probably at the most peace I have been personally in a while. It also will serve us as well being that doors can open for opportunities at this point that otherwise wouldn't have, and we have to go where we can achieve a balance of both fulfilling our vocation while retaining life stability. That is the primary reason we are here now.
I also know this will come as a shock to some, and I understand that completely. However, nothing has fundamentally changed much in my convictions - I was always Catholic first as far as my Christian identity is concerned, and that hasn't changed for at least 20 or more years. Now, I can be fully free to live that out, as well as also being more informed about what that faith is now, thanks in part to excellent instructors at Steubenville who have been a phenomenal witness - people such as Dr. Mark Miravalle, Dr. Petroc Willey, Dr. John Bergsma, Dr. James Pauley, Dr. Scott Hahn, Dr. Regis Martin, and of course my ever-reliable admissions rep, Tom Weishaar. Them, as well as those two old Lebanese ladies - Freda Faris and Bertha Nassif - I used to walk to church back all those years ago when I was an awkward 16-year-old who was being prompted to conversion by the Holy Spirit Himself. Any rate, this brief announcement should hopefully answer any questions some may have had lately, and I thank you for understanding. God's blessings be with each of you reading this, and continue to remember myself and my family in your prayers as we begin to step through those doors God is opening for us.
Monday, August 28, 2017
Weighing in on Charlottesville
Over the past couple of weeks, a major flare-up happened in Charlottesville between two radically opposite but equally racist factions, and it has caused yet more division in our nation. I wanted to refrain from saying a lot right away because I wanted to make sure I was careful with what I said when I finally did speak on it, but now the time has come, and I wanted to offer some observations today on this whole mess.
The bruhaha stemmed over the right of a group of neo-Nazi and Klucker racists and so-called "White nationalists" to have a demonstration to oppose the targeting of statues and other monuments that commemorate the heroes of the Confederacy. When they gathered for their event, another group of racists organized by Black Lives Matter and the "anti-fascist fascists" called Antifa decided to hold a counter-demonstration, and that is when things got out of hand. To begin, neither the KKK or Antifa represent the majority of the American public. Secondly, despite what they call themselves, Antifa is just as racist and bad as the KKK, and to me they are two sides of the same ugly coin. Yet, for some reason, Antifa has been labeled by their allies in the secular press as being "cultural heroes," but they are anything but. Antifa has a goal of essentially eliminating anyone who doesn't think or behave like they do, and the incident at Charlottesville just gave them fuel for firing up. Many of us who are appalled at the performances of both these extremist factions have come to our own conclusions about what happened, and I wanted to present the two possibilities I think stirred up this mess, and in reality to a certain degree both possibilities may be plausible at the same time.
Some of my friends on social media have a legitimate suspicion that this whole thing may have been staged to incite anarchy, and although I am not personally sure, it is definitely not out of the realm of possibility. Consider for instance one person - Jason Kessler. Kessler was supposedly a leader in the White nationalist "Unite the Right" faction at Charlottesville, but he was also the guy who participated in the leftist "Occupy Wall Street" demonstrations a few years back - now, how is it that a guy who is supposedly a White supremacist leader also be part of the that neo-hippie anarchist movement too?? The answer is CNN, on whose payroll Kessler is alleged to be. So, let's put a face on this guy to show you who he is:
So, this dorky-looking guy seems to not discriminate when it comes to radical politics, does he? What that means is that if this can be proven, Kessler is a paid agitator of the press to stir up public emotions over things the radicals want to do. And, like I said, it's not proven yet for sure, but it is not outside the realm of possibility either (information from "CNN Caught paying Charlottesville 'White Supremacy Leader," at https://www.only-politics.com/2017/08/25/cnn-caught-paying-charlottesville-white-supremacist-leader/ - accessed 8/28/2017). If this also turns out to be the case, it makes you wonder then how much other crap has the press incited over the years too.
A second possibility exists though as well, although not necessarily in conflict with the first. When Obama was elected in 2008, I remember reading somewhere that a high-ranking KKK leader said that Obama would be the best thing to happen for their movement since Reconstruction. Obama was one of those people who himself was a Black racist - he incited and encouraged everything from the hoopla over Trayvon Martin to the Ferguson riots, and that idiot wife of his, Michelle, even was telling school cafeteria programs to ban peanut butter sandwiches for being "racist."(Nathan Harden, "Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich Racist, Warns Portland School Official," published 11/24/2013 at http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/11/24/peanut-butter-and-jelly-sandwich-racist-warns-portland-school-official - accessed 8/28/2017) It led in time to even a small child being thrown out of school because of chocolate brownies (Alex Griswold, "School Calls Police After 9-Year-Old Makes 'Racist' Comment About Brownies." Published 6/29/2016 at https://www.mediaite.com/online/school-calls-police-after-9-year-old-makes-racist-comment-about-brownies/ - accessed 8/28/2017). So, according to the "political correctness police," food can be "racist" I suppose! Somehow, I don't see a jar of peanut butter or a box of Little Debbie brownies volunteering to put on white sheets and burn crosses in people's yards. But, the culture of "political correctness" has deemed anything that someone considers "offensive" worthy of being eliminated. And, the new target of that idiocy is Confederate statues.
In this toxic environment of "political correctness," much of the nonsense that is being perpetrated under the banner of "racist" is in reality being targeted against people now because of the color of their skin - now White people, even those not technically "White" but maybe have lighter skin, are being targeted, and many of them are starting to really take a beating from it. And, of course, when that happens, it fuels the flames of actual racists like the KKK and the Skinheads, who are starting to find a fertile recruiting field for their ranks, feeding on the weird stuff coming from the leftist crowd, and for at least 8 years being goaded on by a President who was essentially a racist himself. It is creating a dangerous situation, and all fingers point back to Obama on this one - had he not encouraged Ferguson, the crap that went down at Charlottesville would not have happened. And, I will say it - Black racists are creating White racists, and it is as if they want to start a race war in this country. And, many innocent people - Black, White, Asian, Hispanic, etc. - are going to end up being caught in the crosshairs of the extremists and will end up paying the price for the hatred of both sides of that battle. Thanks again, Obama! Colin Flaherty, in his excellent 2013 book White Girl Bleed a Lot (Washington, DC: WND Books) notes in chapter 2 that a new trend among Black thugs is something called the "Knockout Game," which essentially entails a gang of Black kids finding a defenseless White person and then proceeding to beat the crap out of that poor person until they pass out or even are killed. Flaherty also notes that these same Black criminals have been targeting Asian-Americans as well, preying on the defenseless, elderly, and very young (Flaherty, p. 15). The "Knockout Game," to put it bluntly, is the Black version of the lynch mob. However, instead of using ropes and trees, they use pipes and bats, but it is still the same evil intentions driving both. Another development Flaherty notes along these same lines is the "Flash Rob," which is a flash mob with criminal intent to loot and vandalize - this is what happened in Ferguson basically. Again, like any group that is terrorized or oppressed, a need eventually arises for the victims of these crimes to take action to defend themselves, and who do you think is waiting for them to make that decision? Your local Kluckers and Skinheads! Violence begets violence, and as Newtonian physics verifies, an action on the part of one extreme will provoke an equal and opposite reaction from the other, and there are members of the press, politicians, and others who end up really being the only winners out of the whole thing. Again, thank you Barack Obama!
Now, let's talk about these statues. The focal point of the whole Charlottesville mess was a statue of Robert E. Lee that was in a public area of the town, and for many years now political-correctness revisionists have been wanting to destroy and deface Confederate and other monuments that to them smack of "racism." Thing is, those statues have been around for ages, and they are a part of our history, love it or hate it. To eliminate areas of history like that is to essentially censor what people are allowed to learn for themselves, and it breeds a culture of ignorance. The Nazis did the same thing in the Third Reich when they banned art, music, and other cultural expressions by destroying them in big bonfires - the Nazis were wrong, and their political-correctness heirs in the US today are equally wrong of the same crime. It has even gotten so bad that an Asian-American sportscaster named Robert Lee was pulled from a University of Virginia football game because of his name! Lee is actually a common surname among Chinese-Americans, and it has nothing to do with the American Civil War or anything else - it is just a name. Yet, poor Robert Lee was punished for his name ("ESPN Pulls Asian-American Announcer From Virginia Football Game Because He Has a Confederate General's Name," published 8/22/2017 at http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/08/22/espn-pulls-asian-american-announcer-from-virginia-football-game-because-has-confederate-generals-name.html, accessed 8/27/2017). I don't know, but it seems like Mr. Lee was a victim of racism himself, and if I were him, I would sue those ding-dongs at ESPN for it. I guess though "racism" is in the eye of the beholder, at least in the fantasy-land of the "Progressive" politically-correct types (this is why marijuana is a bad drug too - smoking too much of it makes people do stupid things like this). And, that leads to the very issue that these idiots are "protesting," the legacy of slavery.
There are many schools of thought regarding why the Civil War was started, and the predominant one many of us have heard is that it was all about slavery. Admittedly, slavery was an issue, but it was not the whole enchilada, and even the narrative of slavery's role in the Civil War is sometimes flawed - the industrial North and the then-encroaching Federal bureaucracy were not interested in the rights or freedom of Blacks from slavery; the Feds wanted to take a piece of the revenue pie they thought the Southern planters were not giving them, and the industrialists wanted to get their part in cheap labor to line their own pockets. Don't get me wrong - slavery is wrong, it is dehumanizing, and it has never been sanctioned by the Judeo-Christian worldview. But, let's give those who say slavery was the primary cause their due. If it was, then what would the Federal Government gain from it? If it freed the slaves, it would lose tax revenue, right? And, Lincoln was not exactly a lover of Black people either - his solution was to ship them off to Liberia in Africa, remember. So, what was really going on here then was not slavery itself, but the revenue slavery generated and who it went to. So, if slavery was the primary cause of the Civil War, that is why. Also, the institution of slavery was blamed on every White person in the South, but there are a few facts to consider there as well. First, only the upper-crust 1% of the richest Southerners owned slaves. Secondly, some of those upper-crust planters were not exactly White themselves - a 17th-century Black man named Anthony Johnson was credited with being the first slaveholder in the US. Johnson was originally a Black indentured servant who was in the employ of a man surnamed Bennett, but acquired his freedom and began to build up land and wealth in southern Virginia. In March 1655, the colonial court of Virginia ruled in Johnson's favor that a man can be owned by another man, and that is how the "peculiar institution" began in the US - with a rich Black man (Clint Johnson, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the South. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2006. pp. 81-83). On the other side of the slave chain, it was also historically established that the first slaves in what was to become the US were not Blacks either (that came later, thanks to Islamic slave traders - that is something Louis Farrakhan won't mention!) but were Irish, Romanichal Gypsies, and others from Europe. There was a time when the number of Irish and Gypsy slaves outnumbered Blacks too, but you don't hear about that, do you? Blacks, Cherokee, Whites - all had both slaves and slaveholders among them. Yet, this shakedown victim mentality (to use my friend and former parishioner Kenneth Timmerman's terminology) that is hawked by hucksters like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, James Cone, Obama, and others would have us believe that only Blacks were victims. For more on this, read especially about the Irish and Gypsy slaves shipped to the colonies by Cromwell in the 18th century at http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.de/2012/05/irish-slave-trade-forgotten-white.html.
By contrast, let's look at some of those "evil" Confederates that the nutjobs want to desecrate the memories of. Robert E. Lee comes to mind in particular - this is a man who freed all his slaves, and didn't have the conscience to support slavery as an institution, and he was an honored statesman. Then there is the most noted Confederate figure from my home state of West Virginia, General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson. He didn't own slaves, and even had a literacy program he instituted to help freed Blacks learn how to read. Yet, these men are considered "evil" while the same people who label them extol people like the alcoholic general and 18th President of the US, Ulysses S. Grant. Besides being a drunk, Grant was also anti-semitic - he refused to let Jewish troops serve in his own regiment - an order he issued on December 17, 1862, required the expulsion of all Jews from his War Department (Jonathan D. Sarna, When General Grant Expelled the Jews. New York: Random House, 2012. p. 64). On the other hand, many Jewish veterans existed in Confederate ranks, notably Moses Ezekiel, a sculptor by trade who later opposed Grant's campaign for the White House as he understood how anti-semitic the alcoholic Union general was (Sarna, p. 68). Some of them even equated Grant with the evil Haman who came against the Jews in the Book of Esther, saying that his only "elevation" to office was to be ascending the stairs of a gallows (Sarna, 69). As it appears here, it looks like Jewish-Americans fared better in the Confederacy then than they did in the Union, but that is a story you won't hear either (ironic, as many of the alt-Left BLM and Antifa crowd are also some of the most anti-semitic, pro-Islamic hypocrites that exist). I would be willing to wager that Grant was not exactly an abolitionist either, as he had his own racist skeletons (as did Lincoln and others) that modern revisionist history fails to mention. At any rate, who is then getting honor these days - a virtuous Confederate general whose wife was the granddaughter of George Washington (Lee), or a drunk anti-semite with megalomaniac tendencies (Grant)? You decide.
I wanted to shed light on all of this to show how ridiculously biased many on the left side of the political spectrum really are, and that the ultimate problems with Charlottesville were birthed in Ferguson. So, whether staged or if actual White racists were involved, the sole responsibility for the friction that created those incidents rests in the hands of Obama and his fellow leftists, much in the same way that 9-11 was in reality a fruit of Clinton's policies, and not Bush Jr's - if Clinton hadn't armed KLA terrorists in Kosovo earlier with American weapons and dollars that ended up in bin Laden's hands, 9-11 may have at least been delayed for a few years. As President Trump rightly said (and mind you, I am no fan of his either!) the blame rests with both sides. Now, it is just time people start growing up and owning that responsibility. When they do, then this will not be happening any more:
The bruhaha stemmed over the right of a group of neo-Nazi and Klucker racists and so-called "White nationalists" to have a demonstration to oppose the targeting of statues and other monuments that commemorate the heroes of the Confederacy. When they gathered for their event, another group of racists organized by Black Lives Matter and the "anti-fascist fascists" called Antifa decided to hold a counter-demonstration, and that is when things got out of hand. To begin, neither the KKK or Antifa represent the majority of the American public. Secondly, despite what they call themselves, Antifa is just as racist and bad as the KKK, and to me they are two sides of the same ugly coin. Yet, for some reason, Antifa has been labeled by their allies in the secular press as being "cultural heroes," but they are anything but. Antifa has a goal of essentially eliminating anyone who doesn't think or behave like they do, and the incident at Charlottesville just gave them fuel for firing up. Many of us who are appalled at the performances of both these extremist factions have come to our own conclusions about what happened, and I wanted to present the two possibilities I think stirred up this mess, and in reality to a certain degree both possibilities may be plausible at the same time.
Some of my friends on social media have a legitimate suspicion that this whole thing may have been staged to incite anarchy, and although I am not personally sure, it is definitely not out of the realm of possibility. Consider for instance one person - Jason Kessler. Kessler was supposedly a leader in the White nationalist "Unite the Right" faction at Charlottesville, but he was also the guy who participated in the leftist "Occupy Wall Street" demonstrations a few years back - now, how is it that a guy who is supposedly a White supremacist leader also be part of the that neo-hippie anarchist movement too?? The answer is CNN, on whose payroll Kessler is alleged to be. So, let's put a face on this guy to show you who he is:
So, this dorky-looking guy seems to not discriminate when it comes to radical politics, does he? What that means is that if this can be proven, Kessler is a paid agitator of the press to stir up public emotions over things the radicals want to do. And, like I said, it's not proven yet for sure, but it is not outside the realm of possibility either (information from "CNN Caught paying Charlottesville 'White Supremacy Leader," at https://www.only-politics.com/2017/08/25/cnn-caught-paying-charlottesville-white-supremacist-leader/ - accessed 8/28/2017). If this also turns out to be the case, it makes you wonder then how much other crap has the press incited over the years too.
A second possibility exists though as well, although not necessarily in conflict with the first. When Obama was elected in 2008, I remember reading somewhere that a high-ranking KKK leader said that Obama would be the best thing to happen for their movement since Reconstruction. Obama was one of those people who himself was a Black racist - he incited and encouraged everything from the hoopla over Trayvon Martin to the Ferguson riots, and that idiot wife of his, Michelle, even was telling school cafeteria programs to ban peanut butter sandwiches for being "racist."(Nathan Harden, "Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich Racist, Warns Portland School Official," published 11/24/2013 at http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/11/24/peanut-butter-and-jelly-sandwich-racist-warns-portland-school-official - accessed 8/28/2017) It led in time to even a small child being thrown out of school because of chocolate brownies (Alex Griswold, "School Calls Police After 9-Year-Old Makes 'Racist' Comment About Brownies." Published 6/29/2016 at https://www.mediaite.com/online/school-calls-police-after-9-year-old-makes-racist-comment-about-brownies/ - accessed 8/28/2017). So, according to the "political correctness police," food can be "racist" I suppose! Somehow, I don't see a jar of peanut butter or a box of Little Debbie brownies volunteering to put on white sheets and burn crosses in people's yards. But, the culture of "political correctness" has deemed anything that someone considers "offensive" worthy of being eliminated. And, the new target of that idiocy is Confederate statues.
In this toxic environment of "political correctness," much of the nonsense that is being perpetrated under the banner of "racist" is in reality being targeted against people now because of the color of their skin - now White people, even those not technically "White" but maybe have lighter skin, are being targeted, and many of them are starting to really take a beating from it. And, of course, when that happens, it fuels the flames of actual racists like the KKK and the Skinheads, who are starting to find a fertile recruiting field for their ranks, feeding on the weird stuff coming from the leftist crowd, and for at least 8 years being goaded on by a President who was essentially a racist himself. It is creating a dangerous situation, and all fingers point back to Obama on this one - had he not encouraged Ferguson, the crap that went down at Charlottesville would not have happened. And, I will say it - Black racists are creating White racists, and it is as if they want to start a race war in this country. And, many innocent people - Black, White, Asian, Hispanic, etc. - are going to end up being caught in the crosshairs of the extremists and will end up paying the price for the hatred of both sides of that battle. Thanks again, Obama! Colin Flaherty, in his excellent 2013 book White Girl Bleed a Lot (Washington, DC: WND Books) notes in chapter 2 that a new trend among Black thugs is something called the "Knockout Game," which essentially entails a gang of Black kids finding a defenseless White person and then proceeding to beat the crap out of that poor person until they pass out or even are killed. Flaherty also notes that these same Black criminals have been targeting Asian-Americans as well, preying on the defenseless, elderly, and very young (Flaherty, p. 15). The "Knockout Game," to put it bluntly, is the Black version of the lynch mob. However, instead of using ropes and trees, they use pipes and bats, but it is still the same evil intentions driving both. Another development Flaherty notes along these same lines is the "Flash Rob," which is a flash mob with criminal intent to loot and vandalize - this is what happened in Ferguson basically. Again, like any group that is terrorized or oppressed, a need eventually arises for the victims of these crimes to take action to defend themselves, and who do you think is waiting for them to make that decision? Your local Kluckers and Skinheads! Violence begets violence, and as Newtonian physics verifies, an action on the part of one extreme will provoke an equal and opposite reaction from the other, and there are members of the press, politicians, and others who end up really being the only winners out of the whole thing. Again, thank you Barack Obama!
Now, let's talk about these statues. The focal point of the whole Charlottesville mess was a statue of Robert E. Lee that was in a public area of the town, and for many years now political-correctness revisionists have been wanting to destroy and deface Confederate and other monuments that to them smack of "racism." Thing is, those statues have been around for ages, and they are a part of our history, love it or hate it. To eliminate areas of history like that is to essentially censor what people are allowed to learn for themselves, and it breeds a culture of ignorance. The Nazis did the same thing in the Third Reich when they banned art, music, and other cultural expressions by destroying them in big bonfires - the Nazis were wrong, and their political-correctness heirs in the US today are equally wrong of the same crime. It has even gotten so bad that an Asian-American sportscaster named Robert Lee was pulled from a University of Virginia football game because of his name! Lee is actually a common surname among Chinese-Americans, and it has nothing to do with the American Civil War or anything else - it is just a name. Yet, poor Robert Lee was punished for his name ("ESPN Pulls Asian-American Announcer From Virginia Football Game Because He Has a Confederate General's Name," published 8/22/2017 at http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/08/22/espn-pulls-asian-american-announcer-from-virginia-football-game-because-has-confederate-generals-name.html, accessed 8/27/2017). I don't know, but it seems like Mr. Lee was a victim of racism himself, and if I were him, I would sue those ding-dongs at ESPN for it. I guess though "racism" is in the eye of the beholder, at least in the fantasy-land of the "Progressive" politically-correct types (this is why marijuana is a bad drug too - smoking too much of it makes people do stupid things like this). And, that leads to the very issue that these idiots are "protesting," the legacy of slavery.
There are many schools of thought regarding why the Civil War was started, and the predominant one many of us have heard is that it was all about slavery. Admittedly, slavery was an issue, but it was not the whole enchilada, and even the narrative of slavery's role in the Civil War is sometimes flawed - the industrial North and the then-encroaching Federal bureaucracy were not interested in the rights or freedom of Blacks from slavery; the Feds wanted to take a piece of the revenue pie they thought the Southern planters were not giving them, and the industrialists wanted to get their part in cheap labor to line their own pockets. Don't get me wrong - slavery is wrong, it is dehumanizing, and it has never been sanctioned by the Judeo-Christian worldview. But, let's give those who say slavery was the primary cause their due. If it was, then what would the Federal Government gain from it? If it freed the slaves, it would lose tax revenue, right? And, Lincoln was not exactly a lover of Black people either - his solution was to ship them off to Liberia in Africa, remember. So, what was really going on here then was not slavery itself, but the revenue slavery generated and who it went to. So, if slavery was the primary cause of the Civil War, that is why. Also, the institution of slavery was blamed on every White person in the South, but there are a few facts to consider there as well. First, only the upper-crust 1% of the richest Southerners owned slaves. Secondly, some of those upper-crust planters were not exactly White themselves - a 17th-century Black man named Anthony Johnson was credited with being the first slaveholder in the US. Johnson was originally a Black indentured servant who was in the employ of a man surnamed Bennett, but acquired his freedom and began to build up land and wealth in southern Virginia. In March 1655, the colonial court of Virginia ruled in Johnson's favor that a man can be owned by another man, and that is how the "peculiar institution" began in the US - with a rich Black man (Clint Johnson, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the South. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2006. pp. 81-83). On the other side of the slave chain, it was also historically established that the first slaves in what was to become the US were not Blacks either (that came later, thanks to Islamic slave traders - that is something Louis Farrakhan won't mention!) but were Irish, Romanichal Gypsies, and others from Europe. There was a time when the number of Irish and Gypsy slaves outnumbered Blacks too, but you don't hear about that, do you? Blacks, Cherokee, Whites - all had both slaves and slaveholders among them. Yet, this shakedown victim mentality (to use my friend and former parishioner Kenneth Timmerman's terminology) that is hawked by hucksters like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, James Cone, Obama, and others would have us believe that only Blacks were victims. For more on this, read especially about the Irish and Gypsy slaves shipped to the colonies by Cromwell in the 18th century at http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.de/2012/05/irish-slave-trade-forgotten-white.html.
By contrast, let's look at some of those "evil" Confederates that the nutjobs want to desecrate the memories of. Robert E. Lee comes to mind in particular - this is a man who freed all his slaves, and didn't have the conscience to support slavery as an institution, and he was an honored statesman. Then there is the most noted Confederate figure from my home state of West Virginia, General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson. He didn't own slaves, and even had a literacy program he instituted to help freed Blacks learn how to read. Yet, these men are considered "evil" while the same people who label them extol people like the alcoholic general and 18th President of the US, Ulysses S. Grant. Besides being a drunk, Grant was also anti-semitic - he refused to let Jewish troops serve in his own regiment - an order he issued on December 17, 1862, required the expulsion of all Jews from his War Department (Jonathan D. Sarna, When General Grant Expelled the Jews. New York: Random House, 2012. p. 64). On the other hand, many Jewish veterans existed in Confederate ranks, notably Moses Ezekiel, a sculptor by trade who later opposed Grant's campaign for the White House as he understood how anti-semitic the alcoholic Union general was (Sarna, p. 68). Some of them even equated Grant with the evil Haman who came against the Jews in the Book of Esther, saying that his only "elevation" to office was to be ascending the stairs of a gallows (Sarna, 69). As it appears here, it looks like Jewish-Americans fared better in the Confederacy then than they did in the Union, but that is a story you won't hear either (ironic, as many of the alt-Left BLM and Antifa crowd are also some of the most anti-semitic, pro-Islamic hypocrites that exist). I would be willing to wager that Grant was not exactly an abolitionist either, as he had his own racist skeletons (as did Lincoln and others) that modern revisionist history fails to mention. At any rate, who is then getting honor these days - a virtuous Confederate general whose wife was the granddaughter of George Washington (Lee), or a drunk anti-semite with megalomaniac tendencies (Grant)? You decide.
I wanted to shed light on all of this to show how ridiculously biased many on the left side of the political spectrum really are, and that the ultimate problems with Charlottesville were birthed in Ferguson. So, whether staged or if actual White racists were involved, the sole responsibility for the friction that created those incidents rests in the hands of Obama and his fellow leftists, much in the same way that 9-11 was in reality a fruit of Clinton's policies, and not Bush Jr's - if Clinton hadn't armed KLA terrorists in Kosovo earlier with American weapons and dollars that ended up in bin Laden's hands, 9-11 may have at least been delayed for a few years. As President Trump rightly said (and mind you, I am no fan of his either!) the blame rests with both sides. Now, it is just time people start growing up and owning that responsibility. When they do, then this will not be happening any more:
Friday, July 21, 2017
"I Am of Armenia" and other Recent Reflections
A couple of months ago, at around the 102nd commemoration of the victims of the brutal genocide committed against Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks, and others by the barbaric Ottoman Turks and their successors the Kemalists, a movie was released entitled The Promise that documented with great historical accuracy those atrocities. I was unable to see The Promise at the theatre when it was showing, but on July 18th the DVD was released, and I managed to get my own copy of it and watch it. It was a powerful movie, and it chronicles a very serious tragedy against innocent ethnic groups that the Turkish government even today (more so with that psychopath Erdogan in power) denies and suppresses when it is addressed. The Turkish lobby has even recruited Congressional flunkies like that coward Steve Cohen of Tennessee to engage in historical revisionism denying what happened, and therefore a movie like this could not have come at a better time. If you haven't seen it yet, I recommend you do so - it is an intense picture, but it is also powerfully enlightening too.
I wanted to introduce that, as it provides a prelude for many things I want to discuss today. I want to first of all give my own story of how I became involved with advocacy for the Armenians and Assyrians, and then I want to progress into relating how that recently my own passion for this cause has been re-ignited in a very personal way after many years of dormancy. This is a bit of a complicated story to recount, and therefore I need to refer to my journals for some structure in putting it together.
I have been personally involved in advocacy for Armenians and Assyrians in particular for just about 30 years, as I began to become interested in their stories in my sophomore year of high school. There are several things that sparked this interest, and I want to begin by talking about some of those. First, there is my love of true history, which goes back to when I was very young. Remember - as do many of my old classmates I went to elementary school! - I was the kid who read a whole set of World Book Encyclopedias through several times (not to mention the old 1960's set of Grollier's my grandmother had at her house), and I developed a deeper sense of appreciation for history. It was my best subject all the way through school, and I still enjoy reading various aspects of it today. A second factor to mention is the Judeo-Christian mindset which was fostered by the environment I was raised in - although I didn't officially become a Christian myself until I was 16 years of age, I was exposed to faith and had read the entire Old Testament through by the time I was 12. It is a worldview that is very much a part of my personal identity, and still governs how I perceive things today, which is something I will not regret nor apologize for. That worldview also made me more appreciative of the Jewish people as well as quite interested in and empathetic to persecuted Christian minorities. As a result, I have always had a very dim view of Islam, and the more I learn the more Islam repulses me personally as a person of Christian faith. I also have a low opinion of secularization, although I am slightly more tolerant of it. A third factor of note in shaping my perspective on all this is my own roots. Although I didn't really discover all the riches of my family tree until much later (around the year 2004 to be exact) what I did know is that something about me was unique, but unfortunately I could never put my finger on what exactly that was nor could I substantiate myself in a conversation about it until very recently until I was able to chart a traceable and verifiable pedigree of my heritage which confirmed some things about myself I never would have imagined in my wildest dreams. Therefore, this combination of a love of historical research, a deeply-ingrained Judeo-Christian worldview and convictions, and a feeling of special purpose I had since I was quite young began to manifest itself in many facets of my own life, some progressively and some profoundly. And, that is where my work over the years with Armenians and Assyrians comes into the picture.
When I was in my sophomore year of high school in 1987, our class had a very gifted (although politically liberal!) teacher by the name of Ann Robb who, unbeknownst even to her, introduced me to something that would change my life. The class was a World Cultures high school course, and Miss Robb had a way of really drawing out people's interests in things, and she really got my attention for some reason when we were discussing in the class about Byzantium. When the Western Roman Empire just sort of disintegrated in the 6th century, Rome itself did not, but rather lived on in the East - due to its location though, the Empire became far less Roman and increasingly more Greek, and it was also a very Christian empire that fostered and preserved a very rich spiritual heritage that we see reflected in the Eastern Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic Churches today. That incarnation of the Roman legacy lived on for almost another thousand years, until the Ottoman Turks shattered it in the year 1453. When I began learning more about the legacy of Byzantium, I fell in love with it - to me, it was the ideal Christian state. Ironically, at that time I was a Southern Baptist, but since an early age I was also drawn to sacramental/liturgical expressions of faith, and the Orthodox Church embodied something about that which I could not escape - the beauty of the liturgy, its richness, and the story of perseverance in the face of great adversity and persecution (first by Islam and later by Communism) attracted me, and in time it would lead to my own growth into a Catholic Christian identity. However, as I studied about Byzantium, I also learned of other very important Christian ethnic groups in the region which had suffered great oppression under Islamic domination, yet they survived, and that impressed me more. One of those groups was the Armenians, and I now want to talk about them briefly.
Until 1987, I had very little knowledge of who or what an Armenian was. The only two references I had came from a bad political cartoon and a popular Rosemary Clooney hit record from the early 1950's. The cartoon I recall seeing in an old Newsweek back around 1980-81, and it depicted an Armenian character trying to commit suicide with an electric razor. Looking back on it, I am stunned at the fact that a "mainstream" news publication like that would publish something so racist and nasty, and although I wanted to share it here for reference, I was kind of relieved I didn't find it in a Google search - that thing needed to be destroyed. The song in question by Rosemary Clooney on the other hand was her immensely big hit recording of a song called "Come on a-My House," which was actually composed by two Armenian-Americans, cartoonist legend Ross Bagdasarian (who created the character of David Seville of the Chipmunks) and his cousin, beloved author William Saroyan. The story behind Rosemary Clooney's recording of that song, which was the idea of Mitch Miller, who was the A & R man at Columbia Records at the time and threatened to can Clooney if she refused, was that when she recorded the song, it was supposed to be in an Armenian accent as inspired by its composers. Since Clooney had no clue as to what an Armenian was, she recorded the song singing with an Italian accent instead, and it made recording history. It is a cute song, featuring famed harpsichordist Johnny Guarneri's talent (Guarneri, over a decade earlier, was also featured with Artie Shaw's Gramercy Five, and their recording of "Summit Ridge Drive" is a big band classic), but it is the product of two very iconic Armenian-American composers. I knew of that also due to the fact I was collecting vintage music since I was 12. Those two references were the only thing to that point that I knew about Armenians, and that was scant at best. However, thanks to a gifted high school history teacher who stimulated my interest in the Byzantine legacy, I was about to learn a lot about them. But, I wanted to go back to that offensive cartoon for a bit, as I have my own axe to grind with that.
The fact that a major publication like Newsweek ever allowed such an offensive cartoon to be published revealed two things for me. First, although that was around 1980, it showed how much the US was manipulated by a powerful Turkish lobby (and this was even before Turkish concubines like Steve Cohen were elected to our Congress!), Second, it reveals that even back then, those who call themselves "liberals" or "progressives" are some of the biggest hypocrites when it comes to the whole issue of racism. Some of the crazy things they have been labeling as "racist" recently (peanut butter sandwiches, chocolate brownies, marble statues, and now even clean streets - for that I refer you to this article about a mentally-unbalanced Seattle councilman who had problems with cleaning disease-causing excrement and urine stains off public sidewalks; it can be found at http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/07/13/seattle-councilman-criticizes-plan-to-hose-excrement-off-sidewalks-because-its-racially-insensitive/?utm_content=bufferb6fde&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer) are so ridiculous that a sane person would not be able to keep a straight face hearing them drone on about it, but then they allow crap like an anti-Armenian cartoon to be published in a major "mainstream" news rag because Armenians are not as important as their powerful Turkish Islamic friends. It makes me think this world is getting either stupider, scarier, or both. I have also seen these same "progressives" wail and flail about perceived "anti-Islamism" in the US, but the same people totally ignore the slaughter of thousands of Assyrian Christians by the demonic hordes of ISIS. Women are degraded, treated as mere property, and depersonalized in the grossest way in Islamic lands, yet our self-professed "feminists" in this country are more obsessed with killing babies and the right of some hairy lesbians to cross-dress and inappropriately use men's rooms in public places. Really people? It is also ironic that these same "progressives" are hell-bent on condemning Israel for being in a land that their ancestors possessed for about 3900 years, yet they say nothing about the fact that Turks invaded and displaced Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, and others who have been in Asia Minor for thousands of years. I guess barbaric Turkish Muslims are more important than persecuted Jews in their eyes - oh well! I have already done a study on my theological blog about why I believe Turkey is what Ezekiel 38-39 is talking about, but since writing that and seeing the erratic and unpredictable actions of Erdogan recently, I am more convinced than ever that Turkey fits that description of Gog/Magog in the passage. At some point, I will be revisiting that in my theological blogs, so check back on that one. Ironically, it is not just "progressive liberals" who act like this either - some self-professed conservatives are unfortunately equally as ignorant, and are willing to give Erdogan a free hand while having Cold War flashbacks at the very mention of Vladimir Putin's name - that makes even less sense to me. As Americans, we have one of the most ill-informed populations when it comes to current events and world issues, and both liberals and conservatives are guilty of that sin. That is why, thankfully, there are some of us who can see beyond certain manifestations of "group-think" and can see a fuller picture, and I thank my Armenian and Assyrian friends for helping me see it too. Now, back to the story.
As I mentioned, it was through reading about the Byzantine legacy that I learned about Armenians, and I decided to contact the Eastern Diocese of their Church in New York to get more information. Shortly after writing and sending the letter, I received a huge package of material, chock-full of booklets, pamphlets, and other material, from the Eastern Diocese of the Armenian Church. Within that material was a small booklet about the Armenian Genocide, and I read that first. Mind you, I was 17 years old at this point and had never heard about any of this, so I was learning about the Genocide for the first time in my life. As I read this material, I was horrified - the atrocities committed against Armenians by the Turks for simply being Armenians was on a horrifying scale that would not be seen again until Hitler initiated the "Final Solution" some 24 years later in Nazi Germany (and, come to find out, what the Turks did to Armenians and others inspired Hitler's own atrocities against the Jews too). I had never been particularly fond of the Turks anyway, but what I was starting to learn really caused me to have indignation against them - I had always seen them as somewhat barbaric, too Muslim, and even untrustworthy (before any butt-hurt "political correct" police nail me for that statement, let me also say that I know good Turks too who are decent human beings, and this in no way should be construed to be reflected upon them as a race, but rather condemns an official act of their empire against groups of people they hated). Then, as I continued reading, I came across some other references to these "Assyrians" of the Hakkari Mountains of Eastern Turkey who were also slaughtered by the thousands, and that really got my attention. This now leads to the next part of the story.
In reading both the Old Testament and my various history textbooks I had been assigned to read up to that point, I knew of the ancient Assyrian Empire of antiquity. This is the empire of a ruthlessly-efficient warrior people who at one time conquered most of the civilized Near East, led by great kings such as Shalmanezer, Ashurbanipal, Tiglath-Pileser III, and Sargon II. These were also the people noted for the famous "winged bull" statues like the one below:
I also knew the Assyrians were the people the Prophet Jonah preached to in their capital city of Nineveh, causing one of the greatest spiritual renewal movements of all time. But, outside of that, I knew little if anything. If you read most history books on the subject (even religious ones), the Assyrian Empire was defeated by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon in 612 BC, and for some reason most historians had the Assyrians as a people just sort of going "poof!" and disappearing off the face of the earth. For one thing, that makes no sense whatsoever, because no nation, even a conquered one, just simply vanishes - logic dictates that the Assyrians had to have survived and gone somewhere. As it turns out, they actually did - in subsequent centuries after the fall of the classical Assyrian Empire, the remnants of the Assyrians eventually formed several small kingdoms, of note being the Kingdom of Oeshroene, which was centered around the city of Edessa, and a little further east the Kingdom of Adiabene. These two little states would later become significant, as they would be the first people to accept the message of the Gospel en masse, and there is a whole legend even behind that - legend has it that one of their kings, Abgar Ukomo (meaning "the Black," possibly due to a skin discoloration from a debilitating disease), was said to have heard about Jesus from traveling merchants, and that Jesus was facing a lot of flak from the Jewish religious leaders. Somewhat touched by the story, Abgar offers to let Jesus come to his kingdom, as His message would be welcomed, and he sent a letter to Jesus communicating this information. Jesus was obviously touched by the gesture of this sincere king, but had to decline due to the nature of the Kerygma, but He supposedly sent to Abgar a cloth with the likeness of His face on it, and when Abgar received that cloth, it healed him. After that, the king and his whole nation accepted the Christian message, hence why Assyrians are predominantly Christian even to this day. Many people dismiss the Abgar story as semi-fiction or even all fiction, but there seems to be a Gospel passage that collaborates the story in John 12:20. The passage records that a certain number of "Greeks" (which may refer to any Gentile people and not merely ethnic Greeks) who came up for a Jewish religious festival in Jerusalem, and they approached St. Philip the Deacon and Apostle about it. When Jesus heard, His response was that His mission of salvation needed to be fulfilled, as He predicted His own death in the passage. This being the case, could those "Greeks" have been in reality Abgar's emissaries? That is definitely worth a theological discussion, and I mention it here because it could give some relevance to the Abgar narrative too. The Assyrians today point to that moment as being when they as a people became Christian, and it definitely may have some substance. Anyway, those were some things that convinced me that Assyrians still existed, and as the story progresses, I would get to know many of them in the coming years.
I have been personally involved in advocacy for Armenians and Assyrians in particular for just about 30 years, as I began to become interested in their stories in my sophomore year of high school. There are several things that sparked this interest, and I want to begin by talking about some of those. First, there is my love of true history, which goes back to when I was very young. Remember - as do many of my old classmates I went to elementary school! - I was the kid who read a whole set of World Book Encyclopedias through several times (not to mention the old 1960's set of Grollier's my grandmother had at her house), and I developed a deeper sense of appreciation for history. It was my best subject all the way through school, and I still enjoy reading various aspects of it today. A second factor to mention is the Judeo-Christian mindset which was fostered by the environment I was raised in - although I didn't officially become a Christian myself until I was 16 years of age, I was exposed to faith and had read the entire Old Testament through by the time I was 12. It is a worldview that is very much a part of my personal identity, and still governs how I perceive things today, which is something I will not regret nor apologize for. That worldview also made me more appreciative of the Jewish people as well as quite interested in and empathetic to persecuted Christian minorities. As a result, I have always had a very dim view of Islam, and the more I learn the more Islam repulses me personally as a person of Christian faith. I also have a low opinion of secularization, although I am slightly more tolerant of it. A third factor of note in shaping my perspective on all this is my own roots. Although I didn't really discover all the riches of my family tree until much later (around the year 2004 to be exact) what I did know is that something about me was unique, but unfortunately I could never put my finger on what exactly that was nor could I substantiate myself in a conversation about it until very recently until I was able to chart a traceable and verifiable pedigree of my heritage which confirmed some things about myself I never would have imagined in my wildest dreams. Therefore, this combination of a love of historical research, a deeply-ingrained Judeo-Christian worldview and convictions, and a feeling of special purpose I had since I was quite young began to manifest itself in many facets of my own life, some progressively and some profoundly. And, that is where my work over the years with Armenians and Assyrians comes into the picture.
When I was in my sophomore year of high school in 1987, our class had a very gifted (although politically liberal!) teacher by the name of Ann Robb who, unbeknownst even to her, introduced me to something that would change my life. The class was a World Cultures high school course, and Miss Robb had a way of really drawing out people's interests in things, and she really got my attention for some reason when we were discussing in the class about Byzantium. When the Western Roman Empire just sort of disintegrated in the 6th century, Rome itself did not, but rather lived on in the East - due to its location though, the Empire became far less Roman and increasingly more Greek, and it was also a very Christian empire that fostered and preserved a very rich spiritual heritage that we see reflected in the Eastern Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic Churches today. That incarnation of the Roman legacy lived on for almost another thousand years, until the Ottoman Turks shattered it in the year 1453. When I began learning more about the legacy of Byzantium, I fell in love with it - to me, it was the ideal Christian state. Ironically, at that time I was a Southern Baptist, but since an early age I was also drawn to sacramental/liturgical expressions of faith, and the Orthodox Church embodied something about that which I could not escape - the beauty of the liturgy, its richness, and the story of perseverance in the face of great adversity and persecution (first by Islam and later by Communism) attracted me, and in time it would lead to my own growth into a Catholic Christian identity. However, as I studied about Byzantium, I also learned of other very important Christian ethnic groups in the region which had suffered great oppression under Islamic domination, yet they survived, and that impressed me more. One of those groups was the Armenians, and I now want to talk about them briefly.
Until 1987, I had very little knowledge of who or what an Armenian was. The only two references I had came from a bad political cartoon and a popular Rosemary Clooney hit record from the early 1950's. The cartoon I recall seeing in an old Newsweek back around 1980-81, and it depicted an Armenian character trying to commit suicide with an electric razor. Looking back on it, I am stunned at the fact that a "mainstream" news publication like that would publish something so racist and nasty, and although I wanted to share it here for reference, I was kind of relieved I didn't find it in a Google search - that thing needed to be destroyed. The song in question by Rosemary Clooney on the other hand was her immensely big hit recording of a song called "Come on a-My House," which was actually composed by two Armenian-Americans, cartoonist legend Ross Bagdasarian (who created the character of David Seville of the Chipmunks) and his cousin, beloved author William Saroyan. The story behind Rosemary Clooney's recording of that song, which was the idea of Mitch Miller, who was the A & R man at Columbia Records at the time and threatened to can Clooney if she refused, was that when she recorded the song, it was supposed to be in an Armenian accent as inspired by its composers. Since Clooney had no clue as to what an Armenian was, she recorded the song singing with an Italian accent instead, and it made recording history. It is a cute song, featuring famed harpsichordist Johnny Guarneri's talent (Guarneri, over a decade earlier, was also featured with Artie Shaw's Gramercy Five, and their recording of "Summit Ridge Drive" is a big band classic), but it is the product of two very iconic Armenian-American composers. I knew of that also due to the fact I was collecting vintage music since I was 12. Those two references were the only thing to that point that I knew about Armenians, and that was scant at best. However, thanks to a gifted high school history teacher who stimulated my interest in the Byzantine legacy, I was about to learn a lot about them. But, I wanted to go back to that offensive cartoon for a bit, as I have my own axe to grind with that.
The fact that a major publication like Newsweek ever allowed such an offensive cartoon to be published revealed two things for me. First, although that was around 1980, it showed how much the US was manipulated by a powerful Turkish lobby (and this was even before Turkish concubines like Steve Cohen were elected to our Congress!), Second, it reveals that even back then, those who call themselves "liberals" or "progressives" are some of the biggest hypocrites when it comes to the whole issue of racism. Some of the crazy things they have been labeling as "racist" recently (peanut butter sandwiches, chocolate brownies, marble statues, and now even clean streets - for that I refer you to this article about a mentally-unbalanced Seattle councilman who had problems with cleaning disease-causing excrement and urine stains off public sidewalks; it can be found at http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/07/13/seattle-councilman-criticizes-plan-to-hose-excrement-off-sidewalks-because-its-racially-insensitive/?utm_content=bufferb6fde&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer) are so ridiculous that a sane person would not be able to keep a straight face hearing them drone on about it, but then they allow crap like an anti-Armenian cartoon to be published in a major "mainstream" news rag because Armenians are not as important as their powerful Turkish Islamic friends. It makes me think this world is getting either stupider, scarier, or both. I have also seen these same "progressives" wail and flail about perceived "anti-Islamism" in the US, but the same people totally ignore the slaughter of thousands of Assyrian Christians by the demonic hordes of ISIS. Women are degraded, treated as mere property, and depersonalized in the grossest way in Islamic lands, yet our self-professed "feminists" in this country are more obsessed with killing babies and the right of some hairy lesbians to cross-dress and inappropriately use men's rooms in public places. Really people? It is also ironic that these same "progressives" are hell-bent on condemning Israel for being in a land that their ancestors possessed for about 3900 years, yet they say nothing about the fact that Turks invaded and displaced Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, and others who have been in Asia Minor for thousands of years. I guess barbaric Turkish Muslims are more important than persecuted Jews in their eyes - oh well! I have already done a study on my theological blog about why I believe Turkey is what Ezekiel 38-39 is talking about, but since writing that and seeing the erratic and unpredictable actions of Erdogan recently, I am more convinced than ever that Turkey fits that description of Gog/Magog in the passage. At some point, I will be revisiting that in my theological blogs, so check back on that one. Ironically, it is not just "progressive liberals" who act like this either - some self-professed conservatives are unfortunately equally as ignorant, and are willing to give Erdogan a free hand while having Cold War flashbacks at the very mention of Vladimir Putin's name - that makes even less sense to me. As Americans, we have one of the most ill-informed populations when it comes to current events and world issues, and both liberals and conservatives are guilty of that sin. That is why, thankfully, there are some of us who can see beyond certain manifestations of "group-think" and can see a fuller picture, and I thank my Armenian and Assyrian friends for helping me see it too. Now, back to the story.
As I mentioned, it was through reading about the Byzantine legacy that I learned about Armenians, and I decided to contact the Eastern Diocese of their Church in New York to get more information. Shortly after writing and sending the letter, I received a huge package of material, chock-full of booklets, pamphlets, and other material, from the Eastern Diocese of the Armenian Church. Within that material was a small booklet about the Armenian Genocide, and I read that first. Mind you, I was 17 years old at this point and had never heard about any of this, so I was learning about the Genocide for the first time in my life. As I read this material, I was horrified - the atrocities committed against Armenians by the Turks for simply being Armenians was on a horrifying scale that would not be seen again until Hitler initiated the "Final Solution" some 24 years later in Nazi Germany (and, come to find out, what the Turks did to Armenians and others inspired Hitler's own atrocities against the Jews too). I had never been particularly fond of the Turks anyway, but what I was starting to learn really caused me to have indignation against them - I had always seen them as somewhat barbaric, too Muslim, and even untrustworthy (before any butt-hurt "political correct" police nail me for that statement, let me also say that I know good Turks too who are decent human beings, and this in no way should be construed to be reflected upon them as a race, but rather condemns an official act of their empire against groups of people they hated). Then, as I continued reading, I came across some other references to these "Assyrians" of the Hakkari Mountains of Eastern Turkey who were also slaughtered by the thousands, and that really got my attention. This now leads to the next part of the story.
In reading both the Old Testament and my various history textbooks I had been assigned to read up to that point, I knew of the ancient Assyrian Empire of antiquity. This is the empire of a ruthlessly-efficient warrior people who at one time conquered most of the civilized Near East, led by great kings such as Shalmanezer, Ashurbanipal, Tiglath-Pileser III, and Sargon II. These were also the people noted for the famous "winged bull" statues like the one below:
I also knew the Assyrians were the people the Prophet Jonah preached to in their capital city of Nineveh, causing one of the greatest spiritual renewal movements of all time. But, outside of that, I knew little if anything. If you read most history books on the subject (even religious ones), the Assyrian Empire was defeated by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon in 612 BC, and for some reason most historians had the Assyrians as a people just sort of going "poof!" and disappearing off the face of the earth. For one thing, that makes no sense whatsoever, because no nation, even a conquered one, just simply vanishes - logic dictates that the Assyrians had to have survived and gone somewhere. As it turns out, they actually did - in subsequent centuries after the fall of the classical Assyrian Empire, the remnants of the Assyrians eventually formed several small kingdoms, of note being the Kingdom of Oeshroene, which was centered around the city of Edessa, and a little further east the Kingdom of Adiabene. These two little states would later become significant, as they would be the first people to accept the message of the Gospel en masse, and there is a whole legend even behind that - legend has it that one of their kings, Abgar Ukomo (meaning "the Black," possibly due to a skin discoloration from a debilitating disease), was said to have heard about Jesus from traveling merchants, and that Jesus was facing a lot of flak from the Jewish religious leaders. Somewhat touched by the story, Abgar offers to let Jesus come to his kingdom, as His message would be welcomed, and he sent a letter to Jesus communicating this information. Jesus was obviously touched by the gesture of this sincere king, but had to decline due to the nature of the Kerygma, but He supposedly sent to Abgar a cloth with the likeness of His face on it, and when Abgar received that cloth, it healed him. After that, the king and his whole nation accepted the Christian message, hence why Assyrians are predominantly Christian even to this day. Many people dismiss the Abgar story as semi-fiction or even all fiction, but there seems to be a Gospel passage that collaborates the story in John 12:20. The passage records that a certain number of "Greeks" (which may refer to any Gentile people and not merely ethnic Greeks) who came up for a Jewish religious festival in Jerusalem, and they approached St. Philip the Deacon and Apostle about it. When Jesus heard, His response was that His mission of salvation needed to be fulfilled, as He predicted His own death in the passage. This being the case, could those "Greeks" have been in reality Abgar's emissaries? That is definitely worth a theological discussion, and I mention it here because it could give some relevance to the Abgar narrative too. The Assyrians today point to that moment as being when they as a people became Christian, and it definitely may have some substance. Anyway, those were some things that convinced me that Assyrians still existed, and as the story progresses, I would get to know many of them in the coming years.
Two icons depicting King Abgar receiving the cloth Jesus sent him that would heal his ailment.
In addition to reading about these Assyrians in the literature I received from the Armenian Church, I also caught a passing reference to them in a Southern Baptist missions brochure about reaching out to Middle Eastern Americans, and in it there was a reference to Assyrians as a "non-Arabic people," which was actually very accurate. I desired at that point to learn more about these Assyrians, so I started digging. At that time, I had in my small library then a book compiled by Frank Mead entitled Handbook of Denominations in the US, and lo and behold, there was an entry in it for the Assyrian Church of the East! Now, this was the mid-1980's, and although Mead's book was a good reference, it was also grossly out of date. I discovered that when attempting to write to find out more about this Assyrian Church. Mead's book listed its headquarters as being on Remsin Street in San Francisco, and also that Mar Eshai Shimun XXIII was the Patriarch-Catholicos of the Church. In the early 1970's, at around the time Saddam Hussein came to power in Iraq, the Assyrian Patriarch was Mar Eshai Shimun XXIII, and he was exiled to the US, where the Assyrian Patriarch would reside for over 20 years. However, when I was receiving this information, Mar Eshai Shimun XXIII was long dead, having actually been assassinated some years earlier. The actual Patriarch-Catholicos of the Church then was Mar Khananiah Dinkha IV, and although he was in the US then, he was actually in Chicago and not San Francisco. When the letter I sent was returned as undeliverable, I found that out by contacting the offices of the National Council of Churches in New York, and they gladly provided me with the correct information. Since I was supplied with a phone number, I decided to call in order to expedite things, and on the other end of the phone was a verbose but genial priest by the name of Fr. Charles Klutz (Fr. Klutz was the Bishop's secretary, and a non-Assyrian; like myself, his forebears were Sephardic Anusim Jews from Portugal). A couple of weeks after talking with Fr. Klutz, I received a package in the mail containing several issues of the Church magazine, Voice of the East, as well as a small informative booklet summarizing the history of the Assyrian Church. However, I would have much more to learn, and that I would once I got into college - I found out that there were also Assyrian political organizations, and in the fall of 1989 (my freshman year of college) I was able to contact a gentleman named Dr. Sargon Dadesho, and he happened to have two books which gave me a lot more information on the Assyrians - I was able to get those, as well as a number of copies of his Bet Nahrain magazine, and in the process I also made a dear friend. I would actually meet Dr. Dadesho in California six years later, and he was a nice gentleman to meet in person. Over the years I have also maintained a warm friendship with Fr. Klutz, who has long since retired and still lives in Chicago. Those contacts were my first with the Assyrian community, the first of many.
In the early 1990's I was very passionate about working with Assyrians, and for a long time I even thought I had a call to minister to their communities. I learned all I could about them, including their liturgies, their music, etc. However, sometime around the beginning of 1996, a series of events caused a lot of personal chaos in my life, and for many years my passion laid dormant in regard to the Assyrians and Armenians. Sure, I still believed in their national convictions, and I advocated for them where I could, but the earlier passion just was not there. However, thanks to many things in recent months, it has been rekindled, and now it has taken on a more personal dimension for me which is why I write this now.
I mentioned before about how I am a fan of Star Trek, and my favorite series of the whole franchise is without a doubt Deep Space Nine. DS9 centers its plot on the character of Captain Benjamin Sisko, who arrives at an old abandoned space station built by an oppressive race of people called Cardassians around a planet they occupied for many years called Bajor. The Bajorans are a recently-liberated but also emotionally-scarred people who now have to rediscover who they are after years of persecution and discrimination at the hands of their Cardassian conquerors, and coincidentally Sisko is also a bit scarred too - he had lost his wife sometime earlier in a battle with a nasty race of transhuman cyborgs called the Borg, and he was a broken man. Then, a "wormhole" opens near the station, and when he explores it, he enters a transdimensional realm of incorporal beings that the Bajorans call their "Prophets." The Bajoran religious texts foretell of an "Emissary" who would enter the "Celestial Temple" and communicate with their "Prophets," and when the Bajoran people hear what has happened, they proclaim Sisko as this "Emissary." It is a role he is reluctant to take on, but then something happens - he comes to forge a very close bond with Bajor and its people, and in due time he comes to discover that his own mother was sort of "possessed" by one of these "Prophets" and that he is indeed chosen by them to be their "Emissary." The whole series of DS9 is about the concept of destiny, a word I understand with a meaning I appreciate, but that I personally do not like to use. In the final season of the series, as the "Prophets" have more frequent communication with Sisko, one of the things they tell him is "You are of Bajor." As I watched that, something in the core of my being resonated with the message that fictional program was communicating, and all of a sudden I am finding myself thinking for the first time in years about Armenians and Assyrians! At around the time I was re-watching the whole DS9 series with Barbara, The Promise was opening in theatres. Events come together for a reason, and I was about to find out even more about that very soon.
One of the things I like to do is I work a lot on my own genealogy. I decided recently to take up doing a little of that again since I needed to divert myself from some stressful situations, and again, the timing could not have been more perfect. Back in 2004, when I did some very extensive work on my family tree, I found out that my paternal grandmother's family was descended from nobility - we have a lineage on that side of the tree that goes back well over one thousand years, and I am a blood descendant of not only Charlemagne, but also William the Conqueror, St. Vladimir, and even the notorious Eleanor of Aquitaine. Another section of that family tree I researched recently uncovered something of great personal significance to me, and it was just the thing I needed to rekindle my own passion of helping Armenians and Assyrians. A branch of the family tree entails the lineage of the de Percy family, the Counts of Leicester. As I began to research back into that branch of the tree, I discovered that they were descended first from the family of a Basque-Navarrese king named Alphonso VII of Leon (1105-1157). Alphonso VII was married to a Polish princess of the Piast Dynasty by the name of Richeza of Poland (1140-1185). Richeza's 4th great-grandmother was Matilda of Germany (d. 1045) who was the daughter of the Holy Roman Emperor Otto (955-983) and his wife Theophano Skerina (956-991), who was the daughter of a Byzantine nobleman Konstantine Skleros (930-989). And, this is where it gets very interesting! Konstantine Skleros was a cousin of Byzantine Emperor John I Tzimiskes (925-976), who was of Armenian heritage, as well as the grandson of Bardas Mamikonian, the scion of an Armenian noble family. Although I am still researching the details of all this, if it all can be confirmed, then I have Armenian blood in my veins, and what a blessing that is! The rest of this legacy is also fascinating as Theophano's mother was of another royal Byzantine family, the Phokas, but that is for another story. However, not only does that give me Armenian heritage, but it also connects me to my beloved Byzantium by blood!
Statue of the Empress Theophano.
This is where it ties into Sisko's story - as Sisko had a great heritage by blood tying him to the Bajoran "Prophets," thus making him truly "of Bajor," my connection to the Armenians is now a blood one as well, making me "of Armenia." It solidifies a long-standing connection I have had with both the Armenians and Assyrians for many years now, and it gives me a renewed sense of purpose knowing that I have a connection to these people in a more familial way. That resolve has awakened in me a renewed sense and appreciation of destiny (although I still dislike that word), and with that, a lot of answers have been provided for me as to what I now need to do and the direction I need to go. Now, it just entails waiting for more specific direction as to what move to take next, and that is totally up to God Himself, who orchestrated all this to come together in the first place.
There are probably some among you reading this today who may be wondering "do I have a special calling, a destiny?" Having faced that question myself, my only real advice to you is to do two things. First, look within yourself, as you may already have the answer in front of you or even within you. Secondly, I would encourage serious reflection on your part - it is important to know what makes you "tick," as certain passions for something beyond yourself may reveal a lot about what your vocation in life should be. This is where maybe knowing your roots, keeping journals, and other practices can be valuable assets. A destiny or a legacy (a rule of thumb to remember also - legacy is destiny in retrospect) is something that is probably the most valuable thing you have been given, so it is important to learn what it is and find out what is making it possible. Things about you - your likes, dislikes, passions, dreams, etc. - are not there by accident; God gave you those things for a reason. For years, they may drive you nuts, as you will feel the frustration of knowing you have to do something, but have no clue as to what or how to go about doing it. Prayer and seeking direction is obviously a good place to start, but there is more to it than that - know what really captures your interest, learn about it, and much may be revealed. I don't have all my answers yet either, and many of us may not until just before we draw our last breath in this life, but the goal is to learn more than what you knew before as your life progresses. Doing that, one day you will have one of those Aha moments where everything will clear and make sense. That is quite a feeling when that happens, and it may happen many times, but don't be dismissive of it. If this encourages you today, then perhaps telling you about my situation will help yours. I will see you again soon.
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Perspectives on the Bill Cosby Mistrial
For the past couple of years, I have been watching with interest as Bill Cosby's reputation has been shredded by a series of allegations that he took certain "liberties" with a number of women, many of which allegedly happened over 50 years ago. I personally think much of this was an attempt to frame Cosby, as a bigger agenda is afoot, and for that we need to examine a few things.
I have been a lifelong Cosby fan, and fondly remember in particular his cartoon series, Fat Albert, which was based in part on his own childhood when he grew up in Philadelphia. Fat Albert was of course a cartoon that featured African-American characters (I also will be addressing that term "African-American" shortly), but it taught many good values - every episode of the cartoon had a moral lesson to teach its young viewers, and that made it not only an endearing program for young children to watch, but also a safe program. It is really too bad that more programming geared toward kids is not that wholesome, and America has a lot to thank Bill Cosby for. Later, when I started collecting records, I discovered that Cosby had a series of hilarious comedy LP's that he made in the 1960's and early 1970's, and one of them was this one:
This LP, released on Warner Brothers Records in 1965, is a classic album - it has clean, decent, yet hilariously funny standup comedy, and it was one of the recordings I found many years ago at the Rio Mall in Rio, WV, for a quarter when I first got into seriously collecting records. Although my record collection was primarily big bands, I stumbled across this by accident and had to get it - one of the best quarters I ever spent! Many years later, I found it as a CD reissue, and still have it as part of my collection today. Cosby was, for me, one of the most clever and talented comedians that ever found fame, and his stand for good values was always a great example for Black kids who were encouraged by Cosby in many of his TV programs and other ventures to better themselves and learn to accept responsibility and not rely on the "victim mentality" that so many Black activists were pushing in those days (and still are for that matter). It was that conviction, which Cosby has openly expressed many times over the years, which probably caused a lot of the issues he is facing now - the "political correct" liberal establishment sees him as an embarrassment in that he tells Blacks to own their behavior and act better than they often are portrayed. And, he is right - Black people, as fellow human beings, have all the same potential and giftings to do amazing things, but oftentimes they fall into the "thug culture" or entitlement mentality as pushed by a bunch of racist Leftists who in the name of "equality" goad the negative stereotypes and thus create division. A Leftist like Nancy Pelosi, by encouraging negative behavior, is actually the worst type of racist - liberal Democrats have a lot in common with madmen like Charles Manson and Jim Jones in that regard, because their "divide and conquer" mentality of nurturing bad behavior and steretypes creates the racial tension such people thrive off of, and that is why they don't like Bill Cosby - he has had a different message over the years, and the Lefties don't like it. So, they took him down - we've seen it many other times too.
In the early 1980's Cosby also achieved huge success with a Thursday night sitcom on NBC called The Cosby Show, which depicted a stable middle-class Black family in a positive light and also served to help Blacks and Whites get along better - when Blacks and Whites realized that the stereotypes of each other were stupid and didn't define a whole ethnicity, it created a good environment for friendship and encouragement. Of course, naturally the Liberals didn't like that, so Jesse Jackson then had to make disparaging remarks against Jews to cause tension. It is interesting that after all these years, there are still people who cannot be happy unless they get people to hate each other, and Democrats are masters of that. As we'll see soon enough, what they are doing could cause worse damage, and it already has.
Now that we have established my personal history of admiration for Cosby's work and what he stands for, there are a few observations I want to make. I am bound to create some enemies on this one, and honestly could care less - the truth can be disturbing sometimes, and there are people who will try to suppress it and revise it to suit their worldview, but in the end the truth shall prevail.
The first observation I want to make is something I noticed which was ominously absent from Cosby's whole ordeal. Usually, when a high-ranking Black public figure is put under the microscope, the radical cockroaches such as Al Sharpton are out in full force, and of course Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan have to run their big mouths about it too, bemoaning themselves as "victims" of "White privilege" and other such nonsense. Author Kenneth Timmerman (who also happens to be a member of my parish church) notes in his 2002 best-seller Shakedown: Exposing the Real Jesse Jackson (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing) that Jesse Jackson is a master at what he calls the "shakedown" - by extortion of corporations and businesses by using "White guilt" tactics, and then also using his "service" to Black communities in major cities as a front to further his own agenda (Timmerman, p. 422). In reality, Jesse Jackson is nothing more than a Black Walter Mitty, which entails a legacy based on lies and manipulation and not on true service to his own people. By contrast, Bill Cosby has always tried to foster a positive image of the Black family, and in doing so he has done more for race relations than Jackson ever could, and that - excuse the expression - pisses off the Liberals. I mean, think about it - if Blacks started to really pull themselves up by their own bootstraps and actually were able to sustain themselves, then who would White Liberal politicians exploit?? And, that leads me to the whole point of this discussion. There is a racism evident in the treatment of Cosby that is actually real, for the same people who want to hang Cosby are also the same people that think that Bill Clinton is a paragon of statesmanship. Yet, we all remember Clinton's legacy, don't we? Even while occupying the Oval Office, "Slick Willie" was so driven by his own libido that he couldn't keep his tackle in the box - remember names like Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, and Monica Lewinsky? Clinton should have been tossed out on his philandering keister on the street, but because he was a White President, he was excused from his own horniness. Those now who accuse Cosby of the same things are not as forgiving of him, and it begs a question - is a White ex-President immune from the law while a Black comedian is not? Again, where are Jackson and Sharpton while Cosby is being accused of things that may not even be true? From their offices these days, one hears the deafening chirps of crickets. The easy way to remedy this is that Bill Clinton should be brought to justice just as swiftly - put his sorry butt on the stand and grill him with questions until he is well-done, and then lock him up in retirement at Leavenworth. However, that won't happen, will it?
The true face of "White Privilege?"
A second point I want to make is that the bulk of American Blacks are not "African-Americans," and they also don't have a culture unique to them either. An actual "African-American" is someone who comes here from an African country up until maybe four generations - for example, my parish priest, who is originally from Congo; he is a true African-American. Also, much of the "Afrocentrism" is actually racist itself, as it fosters stereotypes about Africa and its people. In reality, Africa is a culturally diverse continent, and there are notable differences between an Amazigh (Berber) in Algeria and a Kalahari Bushman. Africans, in other words, are many peoples, many ethnicities, with each having their own culture and legacy. To see what is promoted in some Black communities as "Afrocentric" though, it would lead a less-informed person to assume that every person in Africa wears a dashiki and speaks Swahili while beating on large drums and diddling with chimpanzees or something, and that is a bad stereotype. Many African people who have come to the US - including my parish priest, as well as my many Ethiopian Christian friends - are actually quite disturbed by the attitudes of American Blacks who stereotype their cultures. Proper education in this regard is key.
Years ago when I was a poor kid growing up in rural West Virginia, we read a couple of books in school that have stuck with me to this day because I identified so much with them. One was Louisa Shotwell's book Roosevelt Grady, about a young Black migrant boy in the 1930's who traveled around with his extended family doing farm work as different crops came into season. The second book was William H. Armstrong's book Sounder, which chronicled the story of a young Black sharecropper's son from Mississippi or Alabama in the Depression and how a stray coondog transformed his life, even when his father was carted off to jail. Both of these books were written by Black authors, and were about the Black experience of growing up poor in the Depression years, but both related a lot to my own childhood when I was a kid too - growing up as I did with a single mother, and often living with relatives, I would read books like these and actually see myself in the story. Blacks and Appalachian people share a lot in common, more so than many "Progressives" want to admit, and in many cases ours is a shared experience. There is a reason for that - we have essentially the same culture. Thomas Sowell, himself Black and a highly-qualified commentator on current events, notes that Swedish economist Gunnar Myrdal observed at the middle of the 20th century that the Blacks he encountered had a culture that bore a remarkable resemblance to that described of Southern Whites, even noting in his book An American Dilemma that "Black English" is simply a variation upon the Southern accent (Thomas Sowell, Black Rednecks and White Liberals. San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2005. p. 29). Indeed, many Southerners, both Black and White, share much of the same cuisine, speech patterns, and other cultural norms, something the Blacks carried with them to major metropolitan areas across the US - "soul food," then, is just plain ol' Southern cooking! As mentioned, I have more in common in my upbringing with the poor Blacks of the South than do many of the loudmouths, such as Jackson and Sharpton, and thus I know what it is like to feel disadvantaged. As for the mythology of "White privilege," it exists, but not in the way or on the scale the secularized Liberal establishment would have one think. The true "privilege" is enjoyed by glossed-over criminals such as Bill Clinton, not the average hard-working White (or for that matter Black, Hispanic, or other) guy who supports his family and lives his life minding his own business. There is also, it seems, more "privilege" being enjoyed by those who holler about it the most, and let me give you an example. At a law firm in Tampa, FL, where I used to work as an administrative contractor, there was a young Black paralegal who was originally from Washington, DC, by the name of Sean. Sean was basically a nice guy, but on one occasion in a discussion he started denouncing the United States as a "racist society" that Blacks should not be part of. So, calmly I asked him about his upbringing. It turns out that he grew up in a fairly comfortable middle-class environment and never lacked for much, and at the time I worked with him in the law firm, he made about 3 times my salary and he was doing pretty well for himself. So, I told him about my upbringing, as well as about some of the kids who grew up in the town I lived in for most of my later childhood and early teen years - how many of us came from broken homes, we survived on food stamps and other aid, and many of the neighbor kids around me ended up in dire straights as adults because no one really reached out to them, and all of us were White kids. After telling him that, I asked him, "which one of us is truly privileged?" He didn't say a word. That is why often the talking-heads who get on their media soapboxes with pithy pontifications about "White privilege" don't know what the hell they are talking about, because in many cases they themselves have discriminated against and belittled the kids of the Appalachians. So, how does this relate to Cosby? I will tell you - Cosby was an inspiration to me as well, because the example he set served as one motivation among many others to take the initiative, rise above the adversity, and do something about my situation. He directed that message mostly to his fellow Blacks, who should have listened, but some of his poor White audience actually did. So, instead of trying to destroy the man, perhaps we should be celebrating the positive impact he's had on so many, whether it was the values communicated by the Fat Albert cartoons, or those later expressed by example in The Cosby Show. If more kids would take the example of Fat Albert teaching kids about respect and dignity of personhood rather than emulating a jackass like Justin Bieber, our society would recover from the damage it has suffered quicker, and racism would not even be a discussion because people would be respecting each other and getting along. And, in case some Liberal pansey misses it, when it comes to "race," there is only one, and it has a name - HUMAN! All others are just ethnicities that express that God loves variety in His creation. If you want to eradicate racism, that is the attitude that should be promoted, not the mindless rioting and mobs of the "Black Lives Matter" terrorists. Cosby tried to tell his own people that, and he got punished - it is tragic really. And, that leads to another point.
One thing disturbs many of us who have been keeping up with the kangaroo court that is attempting to condemn Cosby. After all these years, all of a sudden these crazy women start coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches out of a garbage dump, and they all have these "stories." Are they real?? Evidence seems to cast a lot of doubt on it. A lot of other things don't make sense either. For one, Cosby has been out of the limelight for almost 20 years - nothing was heard or said about him for a long time, so why now is all the attention being directed at him? Also, if these women were so "traumatized" over these alleged indiscretions, why are they now all of a sudden talking about it - I mean, if they were under that much duress, why not deal with it when it happened (if it even is true)? This and many more questions trouble me about this lynch mob who all of a sudden are wanting Cosby's head on a pike - the hate and fickleness that even professed "Conservatives" are displaying against this poor man make no rational sense. Let's assume the worst - maybe in his younger years Cosby did mess around a little. If that were the case, there are some things to take into consideration. First, most of these allegations have a setting in time of over fifty years ago, and isn't there a statute of limitations? Second, there is the human factor - Cosby would probably be the first to admit his humanity, and that like anyone else he is capable of mistakes. So, let's say he had a lapse in judgment and took advantage of a woman then - has he done it recently?? For the most part, Cosby has been free of controversy pretty much his entire career, and the evidence speaks for itself on that one. If he messed up in younger years, what does it matter now? And, third - seriously, the man is 79 years old, so are they seriously going to try to lock him up when he may have at most 15 years of his life left?? He's now an old man, for crying out loud! I find it interesting that they want to lock him up for that, but for some reason one of the most violent and despicable killers in recent history, Charles Manson, still sits comfortably in his cell leeching off the tax payers when he should have been put to death a long time ago - where is the justice there? Cosby is not near the evil demoniac that Manson is, yet Manson seems to get more "privilege." No cries of "racism" there, I noticed! Also, what if these alleged "victims" are committing perjury - I would bet they would just get a "slap on the wrist," unlike the stigma Monica Lewinsky had to endure when Bill Clinton pawed her like a cat turd in a litter box. I think the true acts of racism are being ignored, and that false accusations of "racism" seem to "whup-up" people more, which is what the Liberals count on - it is their bread and butter that keeps them in office and gives them their power. And, let's look at a truly repugnant individual who has done something much worse recently, that trollop Kathy Griffin. Griffin threatened the President of the United States, and she even threatened his 11-year-old son, but I don't hear near the outcry concerning that in contrast to the attention poor Bill Cosby has gotten. I guess a nasty, foul-mouthed White woman has more value than an elderly Black man - that is the message the "tolerant" Progressive Liberals are sending. Truly amazing.
I wanted to write this because as I see it, Cosby has been framed on trumped-up allegations, and in time the truth will be revealed. Apparently, it is starting to reveal itself now as evidenced by the hung-jury that led to the mistrial in his case. That is a small victory for justice, but it may not be over - Cosby is now an "enemy" of Leftist "Progress" all because he said this: Black fathers need to take responsibility for raising their children right. He is not the only Black man who said this, as another Black news personality, Don Lemon, noted something similar when he said this:
"Black people, if you really want to fix the problem, here's just five things that you should think about doing: hike up your pants, finish school, stop using the N-word, take care of the community, and stop having children out of wedlock." (http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/bill-cosby-black-fathers-raise/2013/09/16/id/525908/ - accessed 6/20/2017).
Both Lemon and Cosby are right about this, and they share that sentiment with others such as Ben Carson, Alan Keyes, and Thomas Sowell. I don't have a place to tell them myself personally, but perhaps they should listen to some of their own people giving them a wake-up call. The Cosby issue illumines many things, not the least being that racism is real, does exist, but oftentimes it is perpetrated by those who holler about it the most. By encouraging bad behavior and negative stereotypes among Blacks, Progressive Liberals and their "plantation pimp" cohorts such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are doing more harm to America's Black community than good, and that will have bad repercussions on day if it is not rectified. That being said, may we all learn something out of this.
Monday, June 19, 2017
Government Waste and Other Things on My Mind the Past Week.
There are a few things I wanted to talk about this week, and they entail a lot of subject matter, so I will just get started.
The first thing I wanted to talk about is the job application process. I work at home now (thankfully!) at a very satisfying position, but on occasion if something comes across my path that I think I may be interested in applying for to get a little extra income, I jump on the chance to do so. Recently, one of those entailed a company not far from where we live that handles a lot of Federal government contracts (for either the FDA or ATF, if I am not mistaken). The job would have been perfect, and I had all the right qualifications for it. However, due to a security clearance issue - apparently, if you have a low credit score, you are a threat to national security! - I didn't get the position. Knowing how this was unfair (and in Maryland law, it is even illegal to pull credit for a job application) I blasted said company, and that forms the basis of my first topic of discussion today. It is not a huge secret that the Federal government wastes a lot of money on these contract deals - for instance, some of them have budget allowances for $1,000 toilet seats - and that is the first point in this topic I want to address. In case you haven't read the news yet, there is a national debt that runs in the trillions of dollars, an amount that is inconceivable for even a person like Donald Trump to fathom, as the richest man in the world doesn't even have close to a trillion in assets. Yet, for some reason, these Federal contractors allot budget items in obscene amounts for insignificant things - $50 for a light bulb, a thousand bucks for a toilet seat, etc. Yet, when a person who works hard, has the skill, and is a perfect fit for a certain job falls on hard times due to no fault of their own, all of a sudden they are disqualified because of a damned credit score for a job they might otherwise have had. And, if that isn't bad enough, the recruiter or person reviewing one's application will have the audacity to recommend that you get credit counseling, etc. This coming from a person who represents a corporate interest that allots a thousand bucks to a toilet seat, and then they have the audacity of accusing you of some sort of irresponsibility just because maybe your family had some medical issues, or someone in your house lost their job, and it caused the bills to fall behind. A person from one of these idiotic companies who dares to lecture me on my financial situation should maybe re-assess how important those $1,000 toilet seats are - I told a certain recruiter that they would save us the taxpayers a fortune if they just went down to the local Wal-Mart and bought a $5 toilet seat that works just as good. Talk about credit management. Of course, when these contractors have the useless swamp leeches we call Congressmen bankrolling their little projects (with our money, don't forget!) as role models, it doesn't leave a good impression. Any rate, my solution to much of the unnecessary government waste of our tax dollars would be to give the people who are entrusted with those budgets a crash course in how to shop - $5 toilet seats are just fine, for one, and instead of a $50 light bulb, one can buy four times as many for under two bucks at your local Dollar General. But, we must remember something too - government hacks and corporate bigshots don't think with the same common sense many of us here in the land of reality have to, and so they waste money that doesn't belong to them on a decadent and gross scale. If we are to reform government, it maybe should start with re-assessing the money that is spent on frivolous expenses. Therefore, the next time you apply for a Federal contract job and you get rejected because you have less than stellar credit, you have the right to demand a financial statement from that company that accounts for every penny they receive courtesy of our tax dollars. If one of these companies is smart enough to furnish that (it can be several pages long, so brace yourself!) then it is important to do a line-by-line audit of what is spent, and when it comes to "incidentals," learn how to price them for yourself, give an assessment of your conclusions in writing, and put the company on notice that they cannot waste money you have worked your butt off to pay in taxes while at the same time criticizing your credit history without even knowing a blinking thing about you or the situations that may have lowered a credit score, etc. I guarantee, if more of us stood up and really asserted our own rights in regard to the way some companies act, things could be different and more deserving people would be working in jobs that they are meant to work in. Anyway, that is my Economics rant - at some point in the future, I need to also deal with my own position on Economics, which is a view called Distributism. I may do that in the next couple of months if time allows.
A second issue I wanted to talk about is when your peers think they are all of a sudden your superiors, when in reality they are not. Interpersonal relationships are integral to humanity, as we are not meant to be mere "islands unto ourselves." However, the dignity of personhood (a subject I have addressed at length on my Sacramental Present Truths page from a philosophical and theological basis, beyond the scope of this discussion) dictates that we need to be respectful of each other and that we learn to communicate in such a way that embodies that respect. I have dealt with my share of jackasses over the years - I have them in my own family (both blood relatives and in-laws), as well as working with some on the job and also even in church settings - and as I get older I find myself having less tolerance for them. An old piece of Appalachian wisdom applies to me personally on this - if a snake gets stepped on, it will strike, and in the same way if I get stepped on and disrespected, I will have a swift response. Over the past couple of months or so as I am settling into a new home and assuming new responsibilities with our new parish church, at times everything I have to deal with can be overwhelming, and recently that was not helped much when a fellow church member decided to anoint himself my personal "jackass of the month." Part of serving in leadership of a small parish church in a lay capacity is doing several minor things, and at times those minor things can be a pain in the butt when you have to deal with rented facilities and such. One of the other lay leaders in the parish who has been there for a while has been increasingly aggressive in how he talks to me personally, and finally I had to go to our parish priest to straighten it out. The problem with this particular person is that due to a personality factor, his line of work he retired from, or some other factor, he tends to be bossy and treats others like he is superior to them - for instance, instead of politely asking for help, this individual has a tendency to bark orders, and the situation that brought it to a head occurred earlier this past week, and that is the story I want to relate now as it ties into another of my pet-peeves.
The individual in question had recently had a very important medical procedure done which required him to take an extended time of recovery. Before I get into that story, let me talk about something that I consider a pet-peeve on a major scale. If someone is either celebrating something or has an important need, I have no problem making a nice gesture to let them know that I care - it is just common decency to do that. However, if the person who is the recipient of my act of kindness in any way does something disrespectful, I take it as a high insult. In the case of this individual I am talking about now, he had a medical procedure done and was recovering. Despite what feelings I may have, I try to reach out and be encouraging as much as possible. Many people over the week have been wishing this person well, and encouraging them by saying they were praying for them, etc. I of course felt led to do the same, and not only did I take time out of my busy schedule to write the person and tell this individual they were in my thoughts and prayers, but I even put them on a prayer list at my former parish too. With many people who did the same, this person would write back and tell them how much they appreciated the gesture, and then proceed into a conversation about the status of their health, etc. However, not so with me - when I sent my encouragement to this individual, I get an email back with a flippant "thank you" as well as a bunch of orders being barked at me over cyberspace as well as this person assuming to school me in theology (I mean, who am I - I only have a Bachelor's in Church Ministries, and am finishing up a Master's in Catechetics, so I don't know anything, right??). The whole tone of the conversation was very insulting to me, and I seem to be the only one this person responded to in that fashion, and I really took offense, so much so that it vexed me almost the entire week. I was so upset about it, as a matter of fact, that at the end of the week I asked for the parish priest's intervention - our parish priest, who is a compassionate man with a sincere heart, profusely apologized and assured me he would take care of it and have a talk with this person about their attitude. I trust our parish priest with that too, and am confident he will get the issue resolved, but it still is rattling. Honestly, I would expect a person who has just underwent a very serious medical procedure to be a little more contemplative with their life and also learn how to adjust their attitude a bit, wouldn't you think? Apparently this individual didn't get that message, but perhaps they should have. As a disclaimer, any identity of this person will remain confidential as well as anything which would determine this person's identity (such as gender), but I am sure that if this person reads my words here, they will know who they are. By the time they see this, the whole thing may be resolved too, and that is what I would prefer. As insulted and upset as I get at people like this, I am always open to a peaceful resolution if the other party is so moved, and I can readily forgive a person if they choose to deal with the issue and come to me about it. This is a good rule of thumb too - even the most heinous of personal offenses are forgivable, but the effectiveness of the dispensed forgiveness is contingent upon the person themselves; it's always available, but they have to be willing to receive it just as willing as I am to dispense it. On a theological level, the same thing applies even to salvation - it is a free gift available for all, but it is up to the individual to accept or reject it. That could be the genesis of a future SPT post too! Any rate, it feels good though to vent in a constructive way, and it's also OK to do so - some people are under the mistaken notion that even Christianity makes people suppress their emotions, but Christians are not Vulcans. After all, God gave us the feelings and emotions we have, and rather than suppress them we should express what we feel in constructive ways. For me it is writing like this, either for you as the reader to see or in my personal journal. For others, it may be a 15-minute session with a punching bag in a local gym - sometimes channeling your energy into beating the crap out of a canvas bag full of sand is healthier than driving oneself insane from suppressed tension that keeps building and impairing one's physical well-being as it does so. Therefore, if I were to give a lesson today on this, I would say find an outlet when people or situations get the best of you, and by all means vent in whatever way helps you! You'll be better for it in the long run.
The final thing I wanted to talk about today is more on my own inspiration about things. Over the years, I have tended to be inclined toward a rather eclectic spectrum of personal preferences that have in turn defined my character to some degree. Whether it is listening to Shostakovich's Seventh Symphony, or reading the Georgian author Konstantin Gamsakhurdia's The Right Hand of the Master, many things inspire me in different ways and at different times as the mood strikes. I have never dealt with this in detail before - mainly because I have never formulated a way to express it in writing - but it is a part of me that has been integral since I was a very young boy. Even now, I struggle to pinpoint exactly what I want to say, although in my own mind I can see it for myself and perfectly understand it. My wife and I, for instance, love all the Star Trek series, but of all of them the one which most captures my interest and is by far my favorite is Deep Space Nine. Much of the story arc of this series centers around the person of Benjamin Sisko, who arrives at the station essentially a broken man - his wife was killed by an evil alien transhumanist species called the Borg at a battle called Wolf 359, and he is reluctant to even be accepting the assignment. In Sisko, I have seen how I have felt - it is a dark place to be, as you are alone, and you just feel like running away from all of it and starting over. I have struggled with a lot of that myself over the past several months as well, as a lot of adjustments have taken a toll on me personally and I still am dealing with a lot of it even as I write these words. Any rate, while he is settling into this new role as commander of a large space station constructed by a Nazi-like people called the Cardassians, who in turn had recently brutally occupied the planet the station orbits, a small planet called Bajor, a series of events end up transforming Sisko and his outlook. First, an unusual anomaly called a "worm-hole" opens some distance from the space station, and upon exploring it, Sisko and his crew end up at the other side of the galaxy in what is called the "Gamma Quadrant." However, while traveling through this "worm-hole," Sisko encounters some alien life-forms that the people of the planet Bajor call "the Prophets," and his encounter with them makes him a reluctant religious icon to the people on that planet. In time though, Sisko actually embraces the role, and he becomes what is called by the Bajoran people the "Emissary to the Prophets." There is something about that entire story arc that just speaks to me - it embodies the desire of all of us to possess a destiny beyond ourselves, and I believe that is one of the great appeals of this show. That is something I myself have been pondering a lot recently, and I have had to do some reassessment of my own life, as well as knowing that inside of me is the real essence of who I am which needs to be released. The question though is, how do I do that? It seems just as I have one thing figured out, I come up against a brick wall and have to keep looking. Yet, deep within my own being, I know that there is something specific I need to be doing, and that the status quo is no longer acceptable to me. It became more real to me in recent months when, like the fictional Captain Sisko, I myself faced a sort of "Wolf 359" of my own. Just a couple of weeks prior to our move up here, Barbara and I had done a sort of "scouting trip" of the area and also decided in the process to visit my grandparents in Parsons, WV. The trip actually went quite well, as we inadvertently scoped out the neighborhood we live in now (albeit we were looking at another house at the time further down the street), and Barbara had a fantastic job interview in Baltimore that week in addition. However, being it was December, we left out that following Saturday in some very frigid weather - there was snow on the ground, and our little Ranger pickup that we came up in had to travel over a steep mountain called Dry Fork, just southeast of my hometown of Parsons, to get back on the interstate. As we were ascending the mountain ridge, I cautioned Barbara about keeping an eye out for "black ice," and not 30 seconds after I did that, we hit a patch. Our truck spun in the road, and then it flipped and rolled into the side of the mountain, totaling the car and badly shaking us up. Fortunately, and by God's grace, we were not injured, but the Ranger didn't survive. Luckily too, I have a lot of relatives in that area, and one of them just happened to come by - she gave us a lift into nearby Dry Fork to a mechanic's shop, and the mechanic was a very nice guy whose daughter-in-law took us back into Elkins so we could get a rental car (which ended up being a 2011 Mustang - nice ride!) and the trip ended better than we expected. But, like Sisko, it began a sort of personal transformation in me, and Barbara felt the same way. From that moment, we resolved never to just merely settle for less when opportunity opens doors, and it has also made me more assertive as well - I find myself being more straight-spoken than I used to be, and not as prone to take crap from people or institutions who should recognize I deserve better than that. That transformation also helped me to realize that the stability of my own family and household takes priority over anything, and that even includes church work. In the ensuing months, I have come to a lot of other conclusions as well, but time nor space do not permit me to elaborate on those here, but perhaps at some other time. When I listen now to Shostakovich's Seventh Symphony, or when I read something like William Saroyan's short stories, something within me resonates with a "Yes!" in that those pieces of music and literature are speaking to something at the core of my being. As I have time (which is a precious commodity these days!) to ponder things, they start to come together. There are many answers to different things I seek even now, but I also cannot escape the feeling that the answer possibly lies to those situations within myself - the resolution, in other words, is literally right under my nose! The job now is digging it out. And, that can be the real challenge!
I feel as if I have indulged enough today in my observations, but at some point there is another aspect I will discuss separately, and that is what dreams tell us sometimes. Did you ever have those dreams where you can see every detail, and the dream sticks with you for days after? Or, let's say you have had dreams about things for years, and there is like a common backdrop for the dream. All of a sudden, you go somewhere and you see almost the exact building or landscape feature that was in the dream! Since we have moved here, that has happened a lot, and maybe at some point I will discuss that, as it would be an involved discussion in itself.
Thanks again for allowing me to rant and go on, and as always I always appreciate you dropping by for a visit on this, my virtual "front porch." Come back to visit again sometime, and I wish the best for you as you go about the activities of your week and managing your own responsibilities.
The first thing I wanted to talk about is the job application process. I work at home now (thankfully!) at a very satisfying position, but on occasion if something comes across my path that I think I may be interested in applying for to get a little extra income, I jump on the chance to do so. Recently, one of those entailed a company not far from where we live that handles a lot of Federal government contracts (for either the FDA or ATF, if I am not mistaken). The job would have been perfect, and I had all the right qualifications for it. However, due to a security clearance issue - apparently, if you have a low credit score, you are a threat to national security! - I didn't get the position. Knowing how this was unfair (and in Maryland law, it is even illegal to pull credit for a job application) I blasted said company, and that forms the basis of my first topic of discussion today. It is not a huge secret that the Federal government wastes a lot of money on these contract deals - for instance, some of them have budget allowances for $1,000 toilet seats - and that is the first point in this topic I want to address. In case you haven't read the news yet, there is a national debt that runs in the trillions of dollars, an amount that is inconceivable for even a person like Donald Trump to fathom, as the richest man in the world doesn't even have close to a trillion in assets. Yet, for some reason, these Federal contractors allot budget items in obscene amounts for insignificant things - $50 for a light bulb, a thousand bucks for a toilet seat, etc. Yet, when a person who works hard, has the skill, and is a perfect fit for a certain job falls on hard times due to no fault of their own, all of a sudden they are disqualified because of a damned credit score for a job they might otherwise have had. And, if that isn't bad enough, the recruiter or person reviewing one's application will have the audacity to recommend that you get credit counseling, etc. This coming from a person who represents a corporate interest that allots a thousand bucks to a toilet seat, and then they have the audacity of accusing you of some sort of irresponsibility just because maybe your family had some medical issues, or someone in your house lost their job, and it caused the bills to fall behind. A person from one of these idiotic companies who dares to lecture me on my financial situation should maybe re-assess how important those $1,000 toilet seats are - I told a certain recruiter that they would save us the taxpayers a fortune if they just went down to the local Wal-Mart and bought a $5 toilet seat that works just as good. Talk about credit management. Of course, when these contractors have the useless swamp leeches we call Congressmen bankrolling their little projects (with our money, don't forget!) as role models, it doesn't leave a good impression. Any rate, my solution to much of the unnecessary government waste of our tax dollars would be to give the people who are entrusted with those budgets a crash course in how to shop - $5 toilet seats are just fine, for one, and instead of a $50 light bulb, one can buy four times as many for under two bucks at your local Dollar General. But, we must remember something too - government hacks and corporate bigshots don't think with the same common sense many of us here in the land of reality have to, and so they waste money that doesn't belong to them on a decadent and gross scale. If we are to reform government, it maybe should start with re-assessing the money that is spent on frivolous expenses. Therefore, the next time you apply for a Federal contract job and you get rejected because you have less than stellar credit, you have the right to demand a financial statement from that company that accounts for every penny they receive courtesy of our tax dollars. If one of these companies is smart enough to furnish that (it can be several pages long, so brace yourself!) then it is important to do a line-by-line audit of what is spent, and when it comes to "incidentals," learn how to price them for yourself, give an assessment of your conclusions in writing, and put the company on notice that they cannot waste money you have worked your butt off to pay in taxes while at the same time criticizing your credit history without even knowing a blinking thing about you or the situations that may have lowered a credit score, etc. I guarantee, if more of us stood up and really asserted our own rights in regard to the way some companies act, things could be different and more deserving people would be working in jobs that they are meant to work in. Anyway, that is my Economics rant - at some point in the future, I need to also deal with my own position on Economics, which is a view called Distributism. I may do that in the next couple of months if time allows.
A second issue I wanted to talk about is when your peers think they are all of a sudden your superiors, when in reality they are not. Interpersonal relationships are integral to humanity, as we are not meant to be mere "islands unto ourselves." However, the dignity of personhood (a subject I have addressed at length on my Sacramental Present Truths page from a philosophical and theological basis, beyond the scope of this discussion) dictates that we need to be respectful of each other and that we learn to communicate in such a way that embodies that respect. I have dealt with my share of jackasses over the years - I have them in my own family (both blood relatives and in-laws), as well as working with some on the job and also even in church settings - and as I get older I find myself having less tolerance for them. An old piece of Appalachian wisdom applies to me personally on this - if a snake gets stepped on, it will strike, and in the same way if I get stepped on and disrespected, I will have a swift response. Over the past couple of months or so as I am settling into a new home and assuming new responsibilities with our new parish church, at times everything I have to deal with can be overwhelming, and recently that was not helped much when a fellow church member decided to anoint himself my personal "jackass of the month." Part of serving in leadership of a small parish church in a lay capacity is doing several minor things, and at times those minor things can be a pain in the butt when you have to deal with rented facilities and such. One of the other lay leaders in the parish who has been there for a while has been increasingly aggressive in how he talks to me personally, and finally I had to go to our parish priest to straighten it out. The problem with this particular person is that due to a personality factor, his line of work he retired from, or some other factor, he tends to be bossy and treats others like he is superior to them - for instance, instead of politely asking for help, this individual has a tendency to bark orders, and the situation that brought it to a head occurred earlier this past week, and that is the story I want to relate now as it ties into another of my pet-peeves.
The individual in question had recently had a very important medical procedure done which required him to take an extended time of recovery. Before I get into that story, let me talk about something that I consider a pet-peeve on a major scale. If someone is either celebrating something or has an important need, I have no problem making a nice gesture to let them know that I care - it is just common decency to do that. However, if the person who is the recipient of my act of kindness in any way does something disrespectful, I take it as a high insult. In the case of this individual I am talking about now, he had a medical procedure done and was recovering. Despite what feelings I may have, I try to reach out and be encouraging as much as possible. Many people over the week have been wishing this person well, and encouraging them by saying they were praying for them, etc. I of course felt led to do the same, and not only did I take time out of my busy schedule to write the person and tell this individual they were in my thoughts and prayers, but I even put them on a prayer list at my former parish too. With many people who did the same, this person would write back and tell them how much they appreciated the gesture, and then proceed into a conversation about the status of their health, etc. However, not so with me - when I sent my encouragement to this individual, I get an email back with a flippant "thank you" as well as a bunch of orders being barked at me over cyberspace as well as this person assuming to school me in theology (I mean, who am I - I only have a Bachelor's in Church Ministries, and am finishing up a Master's in Catechetics, so I don't know anything, right??). The whole tone of the conversation was very insulting to me, and I seem to be the only one this person responded to in that fashion, and I really took offense, so much so that it vexed me almost the entire week. I was so upset about it, as a matter of fact, that at the end of the week I asked for the parish priest's intervention - our parish priest, who is a compassionate man with a sincere heart, profusely apologized and assured me he would take care of it and have a talk with this person about their attitude. I trust our parish priest with that too, and am confident he will get the issue resolved, but it still is rattling. Honestly, I would expect a person who has just underwent a very serious medical procedure to be a little more contemplative with their life and also learn how to adjust their attitude a bit, wouldn't you think? Apparently this individual didn't get that message, but perhaps they should have. As a disclaimer, any identity of this person will remain confidential as well as anything which would determine this person's identity (such as gender), but I am sure that if this person reads my words here, they will know who they are. By the time they see this, the whole thing may be resolved too, and that is what I would prefer. As insulted and upset as I get at people like this, I am always open to a peaceful resolution if the other party is so moved, and I can readily forgive a person if they choose to deal with the issue and come to me about it. This is a good rule of thumb too - even the most heinous of personal offenses are forgivable, but the effectiveness of the dispensed forgiveness is contingent upon the person themselves; it's always available, but they have to be willing to receive it just as willing as I am to dispense it. On a theological level, the same thing applies even to salvation - it is a free gift available for all, but it is up to the individual to accept or reject it. That could be the genesis of a future SPT post too! Any rate, it feels good though to vent in a constructive way, and it's also OK to do so - some people are under the mistaken notion that even Christianity makes people suppress their emotions, but Christians are not Vulcans. After all, God gave us the feelings and emotions we have, and rather than suppress them we should express what we feel in constructive ways. For me it is writing like this, either for you as the reader to see or in my personal journal. For others, it may be a 15-minute session with a punching bag in a local gym - sometimes channeling your energy into beating the crap out of a canvas bag full of sand is healthier than driving oneself insane from suppressed tension that keeps building and impairing one's physical well-being as it does so. Therefore, if I were to give a lesson today on this, I would say find an outlet when people or situations get the best of you, and by all means vent in whatever way helps you! You'll be better for it in the long run.
The final thing I wanted to talk about today is more on my own inspiration about things. Over the years, I have tended to be inclined toward a rather eclectic spectrum of personal preferences that have in turn defined my character to some degree. Whether it is listening to Shostakovich's Seventh Symphony, or reading the Georgian author Konstantin Gamsakhurdia's The Right Hand of the Master, many things inspire me in different ways and at different times as the mood strikes. I have never dealt with this in detail before - mainly because I have never formulated a way to express it in writing - but it is a part of me that has been integral since I was a very young boy. Even now, I struggle to pinpoint exactly what I want to say, although in my own mind I can see it for myself and perfectly understand it. My wife and I, for instance, love all the Star Trek series, but of all of them the one which most captures my interest and is by far my favorite is Deep Space Nine. Much of the story arc of this series centers around the person of Benjamin Sisko, who arrives at the station essentially a broken man - his wife was killed by an evil alien transhumanist species called the Borg at a battle called Wolf 359, and he is reluctant to even be accepting the assignment. In Sisko, I have seen how I have felt - it is a dark place to be, as you are alone, and you just feel like running away from all of it and starting over. I have struggled with a lot of that myself over the past several months as well, as a lot of adjustments have taken a toll on me personally and I still am dealing with a lot of it even as I write these words. Any rate, while he is settling into this new role as commander of a large space station constructed by a Nazi-like people called the Cardassians, who in turn had recently brutally occupied the planet the station orbits, a small planet called Bajor, a series of events end up transforming Sisko and his outlook. First, an unusual anomaly called a "worm-hole" opens some distance from the space station, and upon exploring it, Sisko and his crew end up at the other side of the galaxy in what is called the "Gamma Quadrant." However, while traveling through this "worm-hole," Sisko encounters some alien life-forms that the people of the planet Bajor call "the Prophets," and his encounter with them makes him a reluctant religious icon to the people on that planet. In time though, Sisko actually embraces the role, and he becomes what is called by the Bajoran people the "Emissary to the Prophets." There is something about that entire story arc that just speaks to me - it embodies the desire of all of us to possess a destiny beyond ourselves, and I believe that is one of the great appeals of this show. That is something I myself have been pondering a lot recently, and I have had to do some reassessment of my own life, as well as knowing that inside of me is the real essence of who I am which needs to be released. The question though is, how do I do that? It seems just as I have one thing figured out, I come up against a brick wall and have to keep looking. Yet, deep within my own being, I know that there is something specific I need to be doing, and that the status quo is no longer acceptable to me. It became more real to me in recent months when, like the fictional Captain Sisko, I myself faced a sort of "Wolf 359" of my own. Just a couple of weeks prior to our move up here, Barbara and I had done a sort of "scouting trip" of the area and also decided in the process to visit my grandparents in Parsons, WV. The trip actually went quite well, as we inadvertently scoped out the neighborhood we live in now (albeit we were looking at another house at the time further down the street), and Barbara had a fantastic job interview in Baltimore that week in addition. However, being it was December, we left out that following Saturday in some very frigid weather - there was snow on the ground, and our little Ranger pickup that we came up in had to travel over a steep mountain called Dry Fork, just southeast of my hometown of Parsons, to get back on the interstate. As we were ascending the mountain ridge, I cautioned Barbara about keeping an eye out for "black ice," and not 30 seconds after I did that, we hit a patch. Our truck spun in the road, and then it flipped and rolled into the side of the mountain, totaling the car and badly shaking us up. Fortunately, and by God's grace, we were not injured, but the Ranger didn't survive. Luckily too, I have a lot of relatives in that area, and one of them just happened to come by - she gave us a lift into nearby Dry Fork to a mechanic's shop, and the mechanic was a very nice guy whose daughter-in-law took us back into Elkins so we could get a rental car (which ended up being a 2011 Mustang - nice ride!) and the trip ended better than we expected. But, like Sisko, it began a sort of personal transformation in me, and Barbara felt the same way. From that moment, we resolved never to just merely settle for less when opportunity opens doors, and it has also made me more assertive as well - I find myself being more straight-spoken than I used to be, and not as prone to take crap from people or institutions who should recognize I deserve better than that. That transformation also helped me to realize that the stability of my own family and household takes priority over anything, and that even includes church work. In the ensuing months, I have come to a lot of other conclusions as well, but time nor space do not permit me to elaborate on those here, but perhaps at some other time. When I listen now to Shostakovich's Seventh Symphony, or when I read something like William Saroyan's short stories, something within me resonates with a "Yes!" in that those pieces of music and literature are speaking to something at the core of my being. As I have time (which is a precious commodity these days!) to ponder things, they start to come together. There are many answers to different things I seek even now, but I also cannot escape the feeling that the answer possibly lies to those situations within myself - the resolution, in other words, is literally right under my nose! The job now is digging it out. And, that can be the real challenge!
I feel as if I have indulged enough today in my observations, but at some point there is another aspect I will discuss separately, and that is what dreams tell us sometimes. Did you ever have those dreams where you can see every detail, and the dream sticks with you for days after? Or, let's say you have had dreams about things for years, and there is like a common backdrop for the dream. All of a sudden, you go somewhere and you see almost the exact building or landscape feature that was in the dream! Since we have moved here, that has happened a lot, and maybe at some point I will discuss that, as it would be an involved discussion in itself.
Thanks again for allowing me to rant and go on, and as always I always appreciate you dropping by for a visit on this, my virtual "front porch." Come back to visit again sometime, and I wish the best for you as you go about the activities of your week and managing your own responsibilities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










